Re: Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-26 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
] Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc. Can Bush be any worse for the rest of the world than Clinton/Gore? If so in what way. Will the civilians of Yugoslavia and Iraq be any less fearful of their lives? Will the peasants of Columbia be more fearful for their lives

Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-26 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
that needs North Korea as a "rogue state" to justify the NMD. Barkley Rosser - Original Message - From: "Brad DeLong" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:07 PM Subject: [PEN-L:9451] Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics,

Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Justin Schwartz
Brad, this is old ground. You think we cannot get beyond the Demicans. We are just stuck with them. You don't think that is too bad, because you think they are bascally OK; you haven't a fundamental objection to the way things are run. You'd like more social democracy, but basically, it

Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Louis Proyect
Why do we have to rehash the question of the two-party system? PEN-L'ers have made up their minds on this question long ago. It seems to me that a mailing list can best be used to provide new information that will people to form their own opinions. Louis Proyect Marxism mailing list:

Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread ann li
nce reform, social justice etc... - Original Message - From: "Louis Proyect" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 12:16 PM Subject: [PEN-L:9443] Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc. Why do we have to rehash the question of the two-par

Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Brad DeLong
...the costs of not trying, which is what you recommend, are the same as the costs of failing. You can think better than that. First of all, there are lots of ways of trying which do *not* involve handing elections and offices on a platter to the right-wing candidate. Second, the costs of

Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread phillp2
Can Bush be any worse for the rest of the world than Clinton/Gore? If so in what way. Will the civilians of Yugoslavia and Iraq be any less fearful of their lives? Will the peasants of Columbia be more fearful for their lives? Will Canadians fear more for the loss of their jobs, pollution

Re: Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Andrew Hagen
A healthy US economy would benefit the world's poor. A Gore Administration would been far more deft in its handling of the current economic crisis. They would have brought in people with actual civil service experience, for example. Fiscal policy is a good concrete example. Reduced taxation on

Re: Re: Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Ken Hanly
Comments are after different sections - Original Message - From: Andrew Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] , etc. A healthy US economy would benefit the world's poor. A Gore Administration would been far more deft in its handling of the current economic crisis. They would have brought in

Re: Re: Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread phillp2
Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:02:05 -0500 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priority: Normal Subject:[PEN-L:9466] Re: Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc. A healthy US economy would benefit the world's poor. A Gore Administration would been