Dollars Per Vote: Green vs. Democratic (Historical accuracy)

2004-03-18 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
At 10:46 PM -0500 3/17/04, Julio Huato wrote: Today in the U.S., continual agitation of the sort described by Marx can and must be conducted (not only but also) within the DP. Not cost-effective. It costs a left-wing candidate more to run in the Democratic presidential caucuses and primaries than

Re: Dollars Per Vote: Green vs. Democratic (Historical accuracy)

2004-03-18 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
(Cf. In 1996, Nader opted to cap his campaign expenditures at $5,000 and ended up with 581,000 votes. Nader's DPV: $0.01, says Norman Solomon in News That Still Goes Unreported: 'Dollars Per Vote' at http://www.fair.org/media-beat/980604.html -- our Consumer Advocate sure knows how to get his

Re: Dollars Per Vote: Green vs. Democratic (Historical accuracy)

2004-03-18 Thread Julio Huato
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: It costs a left-wing candidate more to run in the Democratic presidential caucuses and primaries than to run as a Green candidate in the general election. Howard Dean spent over $40 million, did not win a single primary, and got forced out on February 18, 2004 [etc.] I