kashmir and india (was Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't)

2004-07-29 Thread ravi
Chris Doss wrote:
 --- ravi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nothing unites like hate. and
 for that there is pakistan and/or muslims. the common language i
 share with my indian spouse is english. but not to worry with respect
 to commonality... advice from some relatives/acquaintances on both
 sides struck a common chord: marry someone soon, but just don't marry
 a muslim! even one of the those american boys/girls is ok...
 /facetious --

 There must be more of a unifying Indian identity than just shared
 hatred of Muslims and Pakistan. Wasn't there a kind of pan-Indian
 nationalism that manifested itself during the struggle for
 independence?


i am not anywhere close to an authority, but i would answer in the
affirmative. national identity is cultivated using similar means as in
the US: reciting pledges at schools, sporting national teams and
propogating the legend of patriotism, while leaving plenty of room for
existing sectarian differences (religion, caste, region, language, etc)
to express themselves.


 How do non-Kashmiri Indian Muslims view the Kashmir issue? Is it seen
 in religious terms?


they probably do, now, given the sharp hindu-muslim divide (witnessed by
the successful rise of the BJP, the user-friendly front of hindu
extremism). purely based on anecdotal data, i would also add that it
would be difficult to ascertain the true views of muslims in india, who
are cowed into a pro-india position through false logic (such as
comparisons between india and pakistan) and challenges (it was perfectly
within bounds for my anglophile uncles to support the australian cricket
team against india, but rumours of muslim support for the pakistani
cricket team were/are maintained and brought out to question the
'loyalty' of indian muslims).

--ravi


Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-28 Thread Chris Doss
--- ravi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nothing unites like hate. and for that there is
pakistan and/or
muslims.
the common language i share with my indian spouse is
english. but not
to
worry with respect to commonality... advice from some
relatives/acquaintances on both sides struck a common
chord: marry
someone soon, but just don't marry a muslim! even one
of the those
american boys/girls is ok...
/facetious
--

There must be more of a unifying Indian identity than
just shared hatred of Muslims and Pakistan. Wasn't
there a kind of pan-Indian nationalism that manifested
itself during the struggle for independence?

How do non-Kashmiri Indian Muslims view the Kashmir
issue? Is it seen in religious terms? Russian Muslims
(20% of the population) do not see Chechnya in
religious terms (except insofar as they view Wahabbis
as being false Muslims).



__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-27 Thread ravi
Anthony D'Costa wrote:
 There are two main national languages: Hindi and English.  A good number
 of people don't speak either.  But they tend to be from rural areas from
 the non-Hindi belt.


my experience differs somewhat from this assessment. i am from madras
which is definitely from the non-hindi belt, but is hardly rural. the
number of people who speak hindi in madras (or at least used to, when i
lived there 15 years ago) is/was restricted to the north indian
population and children from the privileged class, enrolled in central
board schools, who are forced to learn the language as part of the
curriculum. and even that is a stretch... i studied in such a school
myself and graduated without even a passing knowledge of the language.
not one person in my vast array of relatives (in the region) can speak
hindi and these are people from the middle or upper classes.

with the advent of popular hindi television, some of this may have
changed, though that process of subtle imposition of the language
(starting with the national programming in the 80s) had itself been
subverted in the 90s through the dubbing of such programmes in regional
languages. we may not see a repeat of the fiery demonstrations that
madras witnessed a few decades ago, against the imposition of hindi by
the centre, but it may be a safe bet to suggest that the majority of the
people from the region may prefer english over hindi, if a common
language is to be enforced.

the other regions of southern india (karnataka and andhra pradesh in
particular) may not have a history of such militant opposition to hindi.

--ravi


Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-27 Thread ravi
Chris Doss wrote:

 Given that knowledge of English is so low and the
 absence of a national language (I guess), what is the
 lingua franca in India? I mean, is there any language
 that people anywhere in India would be able to
 communicate in (like Russian in the fSU)? Without
 that, I imagine it would be very difficult to have a
 united country.


facetious
nothing unites like hate. and for that there is pakistan and/or muslims.
the common language i share with my indian spouse is english. but not to
worry with respect to commonality... advice from some
relatives/acquaintances on both sides struck a common chord: marry
someone soon, but just don't marry a muslim! even one of the those
american boys/girls is ok...
/facetious

--ravi


Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-26 Thread Anthony D'Costa
There are two main national languages: Hindi and English.  A good number
of people don't speak either.  But they tend to be from rural areas from
the non-Hindi belt.  But Hindi is spoken by more people than English and would
easily run into several hundred millions.  Even 4% of Indians speaking English is
over 40 million. So a national language for unity is I think a bogeyman.  In fact
linguistic problems are less important than ethnic identity, although
the latter incorporates the language component sometimes.

xxx
Anthony P. D'Costa, Professor
Comparative International Development
South Asian and International Studies Programs
University of WashingtonCampus Box 358436
1900 Commerce Street
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA

Phone: (253) 692-4462
Fax :  (253) 692-5718
xxx

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Chris Doss wrote:

 --- Anthony D'Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is hard to estimate but the numbers that float
 around, are 3-4% of
 the population, which is not a small number by any
 means.  English has
 been both a uniting factor (in a national sense) but
 also one that sets
 the rural-urban and class divide more forcefully.
 ---

 Given that knowledge of English is so low and the
 absence of a national language (I guess), what is the
 lingua franca in India? I mean, is there any language
 that people anywhere in India would be able to
 communicate in (like Russian in the fSU)? Without
 that, I imagine it would be very difficult to have a
 united country.



 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
 http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail



Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-24 Thread Chris Doss
--- Anthony D'Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is hard to estimate but the numbers that float
around, are 3-4% of
the population, which is not a small number by any
means.  English has
been both a uniting factor (in a national sense) but
also one that sets
the rural-urban and class divide more forcefully.
---

Given that knowledge of English is so low and the
absence of a national language (I guess), what is the
lingua franca in India? I mean, is there any language
that people anywhere in India would be able to
communicate in (like Russian in the fSU)? Without
that, I imagine it would be very difficult to have a
united country.



__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-22 Thread Doug Henwood
Anthony D'Costa wrote:
There are other splits, which have been better handled, for example language.
Thus far 20 languages or so have been recognized by the government.
How widely used is English?
Doug


Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-22 Thread Ulhas Joglekar
Anthony D'Costa wrote:

The Hindu-Muslim divide is India's least problematic
cultural divide.

Hindu-Muslim divide has the potential to threaten
India's unity and democratic structure. Caste divide
does not have that potential.

The Indian government has generally handled demands
for autonomy reasonably well, if keeping the states
within the Indian union is a criterion for managing
splits well.

Yes, we could compare India with the fSU, Yugoslavia
and Pakistan.

Ulhas



Yahoo! India Careers: Over 65,000 jobs online
Go to: http://yahoo.naukri.com/


Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-22 Thread Anthony D'Costa
This is hard to estimate but the numbers that float around, are 3-4% of
the population, which is not a small number by any means.  English has
been both a uniting factor (in a national sense) but also one that sets
the rural-urban and class divide more forcefully.  Indians want their
children to go to English medium schools, irrespective of social,
regional, religious, class background.  But few can afford to and not
all are good in terms of substance.  But there is severe competitition
severe from the demand side.  The CPM (Communist Party of India
(Marxist) in West Bengal, which has ruled the state for nearly
quarter century, initially did away with teaching English in
government schools.  It was a bad decision from the very beginning,
which made the students, who were otherwise very bright, disadvantaged
compared to those with English abilities.  They rescinded that policy
not too long ago.

But speaking English in India does not necessarily translate into being
more westernized.  It is one of several languages that Indians come to
learn.

cheers, anthony

xxx
Anthony P. D'Costa, Associate Professor
Comparative International Development
University of WashingtonCampus Box 358436
1900 Commerce Street
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA

Phone: (253) 692-4462
Fax :  (253) 692-5718
xxx

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Doug Henwood wrote:

 Anthony D'Costa wrote:

 There are other splits, which have been better handled, for example language.
 Thus far 20 languages or so have been recognized by the government.

 How widely used is English?

 Doug



India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-21 Thread Ulhas Joglekar

The Financial ExpressFriday, July 16, 2004HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn'tOUR POLICY BUREAUPosted online: Friday, July 16, 2004 at 0103 hours ISTNEW DELHI, JULY 15: India's human development index (HDI) has shown asteady improvement in the last couple of years. India's ranking, however, at127 out of 177 countries remains the same as in the previous year. 

The challenge before India, according to the UNDP's Human Development Index2004, is to manage cultural diversity. This assumes significance as thecountry, despite its long secular tradition, has experienced considerablecommunal violence in the last one decade.According to the report, which was released by Union minister forinformation, broadcasting and culture S Jaipal Reddy on Thursday, Malaysia,China, Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Vietnam rank above India. The countrieswhich are ranked below India are Myanmar, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nepal andPakistan.India's HDI has consistently gone up from 0.411 in 1975 to 0.595 in 2002.The HDI was 0.579 in 2000. The HDI, it may be mentioned, is an index whichfocuses on three measurable dimensions of human development - living a longand healthy life, being educated and having a decent standard of living. Theindex combines measures of life expectancy, school enrollment, literacy
 andincome to allow a broader view of a country's development.The 2002 report, which focuses on "Cultural liberty in today's world",recognises India's vibrant multi-cultural ethos based on a strong andcomposite policy framework that promotes democracy and diversity. 

The report, UNDP resident representative Maxine Olson said, "salutes India forits multi-cultural facet." In India there is space for state identity whilemaintaining a strong Central focus simultaneously, she added.Terming the HDI 2004 a monumental contribution, Mr Reddy said that culturalliberty was important not only for peace and progress but also for thesurvival of mankind. 

"We must all learn to live together, and celebrate diversity," the minister added.© 2004: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reservedthroughout the world.

Yahoo! India Careers: Over 65,000 jobs
online.

Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-21 Thread Michael Perelman
To what extent has India managed to handle it diversity other than the Hindu/Muslim
split?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu


India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-21 Thread Ulhas Joglekar

The Financial ExpressFriday, July 16, 2004HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn'tOUR POLICY BUREAUPosted online: Friday, July 16, 2004 at 0103 hours ISTNEW DELHI, JULY 15: India's human development index (HDI) has shown asteady improvement in the last couple of years. India's ranking, however, at127 out of 177 countries remains the same as in the previous year. 

The challenge before India, according to the UNDP's Human Development Index2004, is to manage cultural diversity. This assumes significance as thecountry, despite its long secular tradition, has experienced considerablecommunal violence in the last one decade.According to the report, which was released by Union minister forinformation, broadcasting and culture S Jaipal Reddy on Thursday, Malaysia,China, Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Vietnam rank above India. The countrieswhich are ranked below India are Myanmar, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nepal andPakistan.India's HDI has consistently gone up from 0.411 in 1975 to 0.595 in 2002.The HDI was 0.579 in 2000. The HDI, it may be mentioned, is an index whichfocuses on three measurable dimensions of human development - living a longand healthy life, being educated and having a decent standard of living. Theindex combines measures of life expectancy, school enrollment, literacy
 andincome to allow a broader view of a country's development.The 2002 report, which focuses on "Cultural liberty in today's world",recognises India's vibrant multi-cultural ethos based on a strong andcomposite policy framework that promotes democracy and diversity. 

The report, UNDP resident representative Maxine Olson said, "salutes India forits multi-cultural facet." In India there is space for state identity whilemaintaining a strong Central focus simultaneously, she added.Terming the HDI 2004 a monumental contribution, Mr Reddy said that culturalliberty was important not only for peace and progress but also for thesurvival of mankind. 

"We must all learn to live together, and celebrate diversity," the minister added.© 2004: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reservedthroughout the world.

Yahoo! India Careers: Over 65,000 jobs
online.

Re: India's HDI Improves, Ranking Doesn't

2004-07-21 Thread Anthony D'Costa
This requires a long response but I must make it short.  The Hindu-Muslim
divide is India's least problematic cultural divide.  If one were to rank
the splits (which in itself is problematic because of its binary approach)
it would the dalits and the tribal communities versus the rest.  The
dalits are the untouchables or in officialese scheduled castes.  But I must
hasten to add that the Indian government's reservation policy (affirmative
action based on equality of outcomes rather than opportunity) has had some
positive impact.  The rise of the lower castes and the untouchables in a
limited way has changed the basic contours of Indian political power.
Regional parties representing local interests have become more salient
and gradually wrested control from national, often elite-centered, and
north-Indian biased parties.  But the caste divide is complicated with
increasingly class based secular demands.  So the divide is a class
issue, which is fused with the caste split.

There are other splits, which have been better handled, for example language.
Thus far 20 languages or so have been recognized by the government.  Each
language at the minimum represents an ethnic community.  But ethnicity goes
beyond language.  It also includes religion, region, culture, and so on.  The
Indian government has generally handled demands for autonomy reasonably
well, if keeping the states within the Indian union is a criterion for
managing splits well.  The Sikhs and Christians haven't done badly in
India at all.  And despite miles to go, women in India are making their
mark in politics, the corporate world, and intellectual life.  So the
Hindu-Muslim divide is confined to certain pockets, exacerbated by the
politicization of religion by the last ruling party.  It finds far less
resonance among the people than what might be perceived at a distance.

Cheers, anthony

xxx
Anthony P. D'Costa, Professor
Comparative International Development/South Asia and International Studies
University of WashingtonCampus Box 358436
1900 Commerce Street
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA

Phone: (253) 692-4462
Fax :  (253) 692-5718
xxx

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Michael Perelman wrote:

 To what extent has India managed to handle it diversity other than the
Hindu/Muslim
 split?
 --
 Michael Perelman
 Economics Department
 California State University
 Chico, CA 95929

 Tel. 530-898-5321
 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu