Shleifer should get a chutzpah award, writing about ethics, given his
history with USAID and Russia. He got fired from Harvard, no?
At 09:43 PM 8/11/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Paul deserves criticism for his summary of Shleifer -- he is far too
gentle. Shliefer insists that market-induced competition
Robert Naiman wrote:
Shleifer should get a chutzpah award, writing about ethics, given his
history with USAID and Russia. He got fired from Harvard, no?
Hey, it takes one to know one. Why do you think FDR made Joe Kennedy
the first head of the SEC?
Doug
Did he get fired? Just from the development institute?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
BTW this is the Russian newspaper Izvestia commenting
on Schleiffer's fall from grace.
Izvestia
August 10, 2004
HARVARD PROFESSOR'S SPOUSE LINED HER POCKETS IN
PRIVATIZATION
An update on the scandal around the so called Harvard
Project.
Author: Konstantin Getmansky
[from WPS Monitoring Agency,
Michael wrote:
Paul deserves criticism for his summary of Shleifer -- he is far too gentle. Shliefer
insists that market-induced competition does not create undesirable consequences. It
is non-market corruption that is bad.
Response Jim C: I have been invited to present a
1) I, for one, deeply regret the loss of JEP. I don't think anyone
can really maintain that the new version is more socially useful,
especially compared to the way JEP was before the 'great turnover', when
the AEA itself was less monolithic. It seems that within the AEA, there is
now
Paul deserves criticism for his summary of Shleifer -- he is far too
gentle. Shliefer insists that market-induced competition does not create
undesirable consequences. It is non-market corruption that is bad.
And he is considered one of the bright lights of economics.
Paul wrote:
2) Latest AEA/AER
[was RE: [PEN-L] Deeper Problems for Shleifer]
Michael writes: Does anybody niotice the rapid decline in the Journal of Economic
Perspectives? A right winger will take over the Journal of Economc
Literature.
I haven't been paying attention. Why do you think that the JEP is in decline? why do
that the JEP is in decline? why do
you think it went into that tailspin? who is the editor? is it still Brad deLong?
who's taking over the JEL? replacing whom?
jim d
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael
--- Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shleifer is the editor; DeLong is gone. So the
journal has become more technical,
less topical.
The same Shleifer that was investigated b/c of his
work in Russia?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail
Whoops, obviously yes. I hadn't read that post yet.
--- Chris Doss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shleifer is the editor; DeLong is gone. So the
journal has become more technical,
less topical.
The same Shleifer that was investigated b/c of his
Out of curiosity, has anyone else read the article by J. David Richardson,
"Income Inequality and Trade: How to Think, What to Conclude" in the latest
JEP? Doesn't it rank as one of the most explicit instances of neoclassical
bankruptcy? Richards gives us a simple 2x2x2 t
12 matches
Mail list logo
