-Original Message-
From: Jim Devine
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/2/2001 10:14 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:17980] Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden
BTW, as far as I know, there are NO bin Laden supporters or sympathizers
on pen-l. To whom are you referring?
I was referring to the Taliban
Please Andrew, we have better ways of using our time. This seems to be
the thread that you started on the Marxism list.
I have never said anywhere that we should kill large numbers of innocent
Afghans. Elsewhere I have said I am categorically opposed to the US going to
war with
Michael Perelman wrote:
Please Andrew, we have better ways of using our time.
In other words, no political debate, please, we're economists?
I don't get what your standards are, Michael. More transparency, please!
Doug
I agree with Doug. Michael, you seem to be rejecting any discussion that's
unpleasant.
At 10:10 AM 10/03/2001 -0400, you wrote:
Michael Perelman wrote:
Please Andrew, we have better ways of using our time.
In other words, no political debate, please, we're economists?
I don't get what your
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 08:04:08 -0700
To: Austin, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PEN-L:17980] Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden
At 07:47 AM 10/03/2001 -0500, you wrote:
The Taliban is a
brutal atavistic and patriarchal regime.
so is the Saudi Arabian
Hi everybody.
Doug says:
In other words, no political debate,
please, we're economists?
I don't get what your standards are,
Michael. More transparency, please!
He's back! And he's right, IMHO! These are momentous issues that constrain the near
term situation, including the economic
Both Jim and Doug disapproved of my handling of Andrew's post. My
response reflected the way I saw Andrew's thread evolve on the Marxism
list. If you think that it can lead to a fruitful discussion, then go
ahead. I remain skeptical
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State
At 01:53 AM 10/4/01 +, you wrote:
Just building on this ObL stuff while I may; isn't there something of a fetish
happening here? I mean, I go a good way with Andy's position on the bloke,
but I keep harking back to EP Thompson's explanation for why the magistrates
couldn't nip the Luddite
From: Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But getting rid of ObL and his cronies wouldn't abolish the social
historical forces that gave rise to Islamic fundamentalism as a
force to
mobilize people to engage in terrorism. In fact, it might easily
create
martyrs (and US NPR said this morning that
I wrote:
US NPR said this morning that ObL _wants_ to be a
martyr...
What, did they talk to OBL on the phone?
it's probably based on on dit evidence (i.e., rumor). But it sounds like
a plausible possibility.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
Even if bin Laden's supporters and sympathizers wish to ignore the evidence
that is leaking out the pores of official sources all over the world, there
is plenty of hard evidence on the series of terrorist actions organized by
bin Laden already publically available. Cruise the FBI website and
Andrew Austin wrote:
Even if bin Laden's supporters and sympathizers wish to ignore the
evidence that is leaking out the pores of official sources all over the
world, there is plenty of hard evidence on the series of terrorist actions
organized by bin Laden already publically available. Cruise
I concur with Jim. We have no need to discuss the bin Laden here,
expecially when we know so little about him and his organization.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I foresee at some point a man with a white piece of paper in his hand
stating, I have here the names of dozens of known Bin Laden supporters
in the White House.
Steve
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael Perelman wrote:
I concur with Jim. We have no need to discuss the bin Laden here,
I have already been hearing resports of intrusive FBI investigations of
people who have had no possible connection with the bombing -- for
instance, a SF branch of the peace group, Women in Black.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:42:20PM -1000, Stephen E Philion wrote:
I foresee at some point a man
15 matches
Mail list logo
