Rakesh, please leave the personal out of the discussions.
OK. Carrol is not only wrong but egregiously wrong that Marx's
accomplishment is best understood as the denaturalization or
historicization of both categories of political economy and the
bourgeois economy itself.
Rakesh
All you have to say is, my interpretation is ... Others can decide for
themselves who is correct.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:53:53PM -0800, Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
Rakesh, please leave the personal out of the discussions.
OK. Carrol is not only wrong but egregiously wrong that Marx's
Does that apply to Carrol, too? He said Rakesh was not interesting.
Rakesh, is always interesting.
Even handedness in the disciplining of list ecology, plz.
Michael Pugliese
--- Original Message ---
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1/15/02 5:52:31 PM
I missed that. Obviously, I should have noted it.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:32:53PM -0800, michael pugliese wrote:
Does that apply to Carrol, too? He said Rakesh was not interesting.
Rakesh, is always interesting.
Even handedness in the disciplining of list ecology, plz.
Michael
