Rakesh Bhandari on small men who accumulate patiently

2003-09-04 Thread Louis Proyect
Post argues that because plantation slavery was incompatible with agrarian petty capitalism in the two decades before the Civil War, plantation slavery became the major impediment to the further development of capitalism in the rest of the USA. I find the following premises unsubstantiated: the

Re: Rakesh Bhandari on small men who accumulate patiently

2003-09-04 Thread Louis Proyect
As far as I know, Post does not discuss this passage, much less the logic of Marx's argument. Even if petty agrarian producers served as a deep market for consumer goods--and Post's evidence is not strong in this article--they would have undermined capitalism in the way that Marx specifies above.

Re: Rakesh Bhandari on small men who accumulate patiently

2003-09-04 Thread Max B. Sawicky
It's not clear to me if this quote is from Brenner or somebody else, but in any case . . . I fail to see the material basis of the fatal antagonism. Certainly culture and attitudes of the peasantry are an issue, but how is the peasant any different from the worker who owns some modest stock of

Re: Rakesh Bhandari on small men who accumulate patiently

2003-09-04 Thread Louis Proyect
Max B. Sawicky wrote: It's not clear to me if this quote is from Brenner or somebody else, but in any case . . . Karl Marx. I fail to see the material basis of the fatal antagonism. Certainly culture and attitudes of the peasantry are an issue, but how is the peasant any different from the worker

Re: Rakesh Bhandari on small men who accumulate patiently

2003-09-04 Thread Michael Perelman
As I understand it, the French peasantry was unpredictable. You would have two villiages in recent years seeming very similar in every sociological and economic indicator: one would be solidly communist and one would be very right wing. Nobody in France could explain this to me. Marx's

Re: Rakesh Bhandari on small men who accumulate patiently

2003-09-04 Thread Max B. Sawicky
Workers can go either way too. mbs As I understand it, the French peasantry was unpredictable. You would have two villiages in recent years seeming very similar in every sociological and economic indicator: one would be solidly communist and one would be very right wing. Nobody in France could

Re: Rakesh Bhandari on small men who accumulate patiently

2003-09-04 Thread Michael Perelman
Right, but isn't that a fairly recent phenomenon for workers? On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:15:43AM -0400, Max B. Sawicky wrote: Workers can go either way too. mbs As I understand it, the French peasantry was unpredictable. You would have two villiages in recent years seeming very similar in