Re: Re: Martin Brown's a Liar

2001-05-07 Thread Brad DeLong
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Brad DeLong wrote: I'm trying to be a little more polite than my interlocutors. It's a *strategy*: a version of tit-for-tat. You may think that it is the wrong strategy to follow, but it is not an obviously stupid strategy. And I, at least, am not smart enough to

Re: Martin Brown's a Liar

2001-05-04 Thread Michael Pollak
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Brad DeLong wrote: I'm trying to be a little more polite than my interlocutors. It's a *strategy*: a version of tit-for-tat. You may think that it is the wrong strategy to follow, but it is not an obviously stupid strategy. And I, at least, am not smart enough to

Re: Martin Brown's a Liar

2001-05-01 Thread Michael Perelman
This sort of exchange does not belong here. On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:40:39PM -0700, Brad DeLong wrote: Actually, I want to apologize to pen-l for these two posts. Offline Brad explained to me his philosophy of being obnoxious to people in email discussion groups because it is a good