I appreciate the sentiments, but what was it in my remarks that set
off this explosion? If you think I'm opposed to social democratic
policies, you're badly misinformed.
Doug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:06:39 -0500
To:[EMAIL
Date sent: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:06:39 -0500
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:21439] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re:
social democracy
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This whole discussion
Rakesh, please stop calling people ignorant and please stop informing the
list about how incorrect Jim D.'s ideas are -- even though he keeps saying
that you are mischaracterizing him.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 06:55:40PM -0800, Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 15 Jan 2002
As everybody else on the list know, I am not joking. Why is it Jim,
Carrol, and, you add, Paul get into arguments with you? I think that
abrasiveness detracts from the exchanges. Give us your information, but
spare us your disputatious approach.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:28:04PM
- Original Message -
From: Rakesh Bhandari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No thanks, Kick me off the list anytime you want. I shall
continue to
respond in the style that I respond. I am not here to share
information as if I am an information processing machine
but to
discuss and debate and learn. I
Debating and learning are at the core of what we are trying to do.
Personal attacks get in the way.
No thanks, Kick me off the list anytime you want. I shall continue to
respond in the style that I respond. I am not here to share
information as if I am an information processing machine