Hi All,
I think that there is a general feeling in pomo work that before we pass
judgment, I mean present academic work, we need to consider things more
carefully. We may need to study the culture or nation-state more closely
before gathering the data or using an existing set. Pomos are scared
Brad De Long wrote:
An interesting excerpt from a column written a couple of years ago
by The Nation's own neoconservative leftist, Eric Alterman, part of
a classic pomo-bashing screed:
"But here's the twist. [Labor historian Nelson] Lichtenstein is
part of a perfectly Rortyite reformist
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. wrote:
Yes, some pomos are politically active. But here at
JMU a pomo sociology prof told a human rights conference
last spring put on by Amnesty International that instead of writing
letters to Interior Ministers around the world protesting the
treatment of
In a message dated 9/4/00 2:27:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So should I issue a blanket condemnation of economics as
a criminal enterprise, to quote Jim O'Connor?
It's sort of tempting, isn't it? --jks
