from Today's Papers (from MS SLATE):
An op-ed in the NY [TIMES] argues that since Israel's security barrier
goes deep into the West Bank it's a less than ideal security
barrier: What this wall is really doing is taking Palestinian
lands. That's not an original argument but the author is: Noam
An op-ed in the NY [TIMES] argues that since Israel's security barrier
goes deep into the West Bank it's a less than ideal security
barrier: What this wall is really doing is taking Palestinian
lands. That's not an original argument but the author is: Noam
Chomsky. Judging by a quickie Nexis
of Palestine,
etc.
dms
- Original Message -
From: Shane Mage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] a miracle?
An op-ed in the NY [TIMES] argues that since Israel's security barrier
goes deep into the West Bank it's
That's eminently sane of them.
Joanna
Shane Mage wrote:
An op-ed in the NY [TIMES] argues that since Israel's security barrier
goes deep into the West Bank it's a less than ideal security
barrier: What this wall is really doing is taking Palestinian
lands. That's not an original argument but
of it than it is? It's an op-ed piece, that's all. NYT
supported and supports the assault on Iraq, the occupation of Palestine,
etc.
dms
- Original Message -
From: Shane Mage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] a miracle?
An op
]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] a miracle?
No, it's significant even though it's only op-ed. This is an
intra-bourgeois sign.
Joanna
dmschanoes wrote:
Wait a minute-- this wasn't the NYT taking an editorial and reporting
position. This was an op-ed piece
US miracle is based on longer hours for less pay
Doug Henwood
Monday February 2, 2004
The Guardian
In the late 1990s the US was famous across the globe for its New Economy.
Computers had unleashed a productivity miracle, recessions were relics of
a transcended past, ideas had replaced things
Title: a miracle!
From the NEW STATESMAN: The IMF representative in Malawi, Girma Begashaw, replied: We did not instruct the Malawi government or the NFRA [National Food Reserve Agency] to dispose of the reserves. . . . We have no expertise in food security policy. It said that the government
Penners
Here's an interesting interview with someone who sounds interesting on the
topic of the IT investment boom and the great US productivity miracle. In
the same edition of the FT, Harvard professor Martin Feldstein pens an
opinion piece warning that thanks to this apparent miracle the US
, his work is not
universally accepted.
Keaney Michael wrote:
Penners
Here's an interesting interview with someone who sounds interesting on the
topic of the IT investment boom and the great US productivity miracle. In
the same edition of the FT, Harvard professor Martin Feldstein pens
: There was no
productivity miracle.
Well yeah, but this is the pen-l list, who is saying that a miracle
occurred? improvements occurred in producitivity in the 1990's, especially
in the manufacturing sector, no?
Your argument against a 'new economy' emerging seems consistent with
Brenner btw, who argues
[was: Re: [PEN-L:8986] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Indonesian minister warns of
nation's demise-paper]
Brad wrote:
Real GDP up 10% in 1999 and 10% again in 2000? Unemployment down to 4%?
Rob writes:
Hang on, mate! Haven't you just finished telling me (perhaps over on Doug's
list) that the only
/04/2000 -0600, you wrote:
The Guardian Tuesday October 24, 2000
Like the Roaring 20s, the latest economic 'miracle' has been bought on
credit
Another wolf at our door
By Jeremy Rifkin
While the US presidential debates were in full swing, I was pondering
what I would ask the candidates if I had
The Guardian Tuesday October 24, 2000
Like the Roaring 20s, the latest economic 'miracle' has been bought on
credit
Another wolf at our door
By Jeremy Rifkin
While the US presidential debates were in full swing, I was pondering
what I would ask the candidates if I had the opportunity to pose
Larry Ball's interpretation of New Zealand is that it is a victim of
intensive monetarism: that as you look across the OECD, the more
aggressive the fight against inflation was, the longer it was
pursued, the the feebler were the stimulative policies of the late
1980s, the greater was the
Shows the advantages to be gained from not practicing what you preach, if
what you preach is a load of BS. Is there any evidence to suggest that the
"Washington Consensus" was NOT a deliberate ploy by the U.S. to gain
macroeconomic advantage by sabotaging the performance of its acolytes?
Brad
Shows the advantages to be gained from not practicing what you preach, if
what you preach is a load of BS. Is there any evidence to suggest that the
"Washington Consensus" was NOT a deliberate ploy by the U.S. to gain
macroeconomic advantage by sabotaging the performance of its acolytes?
Brad
New Zealand has made a habit of practicing what others preach, and then getting
naively offended when others don't. That applies not just to monetarism but to
trade liberalisation, privatisation, marketising society, and so on.
I only skimmed Murray Dobbin's article (if I'm thinking about the
Brad De Long wrote,
Good God! Ever since the start of the Clinton Administration the line
has been that if the U.S. needs to be more "classical" that Japan and
Europe and the rest of the OECD need to be more "Keynesian." The
inflation rate needs to be
Bill, if NZ growth is slow, how far down the income distribution do you have to go
before you find stagnating incomes?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill, if NZ growth is slow, how far down the income distribution do
you have to go
before you find stagnating incomes?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not very far at all. My belief was that every
Brad, you do have a nice style of presenting your material. I have never
used the concept of "slot." As a result, my typical explanation of that
phenomenon is pretty clunky.
The first I saw of Krugman's discussion was:
Krugman, Paul. 1992. "The Right, The Rich, and the Facts: Deconstructing
Michael Perelman wrote:
My question concerned New Zealand. I was wondering how much it differed
from the U.S. in terms of the distribution of the growth of the pie.
Maybe Doug's studies of the Luxembourg work indicates how other countries
have fared in this respect.
NZ isn't in the LIS. Branko
push devastated the country,
rather than saving it.
It has been so long since anyone in the business press has
praised the New Zealand miracle it is almost as if we
imagined the whole thing. But, of course, the current silence
is really no mystery. The fifteen year free market experiment
has
is
happening to them.
"We all believed things were just going to get better and better," said a
well-to-do woman who insisted on anonymity. "Nobody ever stopped to think.
This has hit us in the face. We wonder if the Asian miracle was ever there,
or whether it was an Asian mirage."
25 matches
Mail list logo
