Re: method of economy

2002-02-09 Thread Waistline2
In a message dated 2/8/2002 10:49:51 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Alternatively Marx insisted that scientific method to analyze concrete society must be began from abstract category, and ascending to shape of concrete society (Engels modified title of Capital as "process

method of economy

2002-02-09 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Michael Perelman had written: Nonetheless, neither simple nor expanded reproduction is entirely without interest. Both simple reproduction and simple value theory represented a significant theoretical advance over classical economics. For example, Marx's reproduction schemes laid

Re: method of economy

2002-02-09 Thread Michael Perelman
In reply to Rakesh's comments: First, I would accept a modifies largely not broken away. Michael, i think i disagree with both you and Shortall that Marx had not broken from what you are calling simple value analysis in vol I. To me simple value analysis means static, as in simple

Re: Re: method of economy

2002-02-09 Thread Ian Murray
- Original Message - From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nathan Rosenberg has picked up on these passages in a couple of important articles in the mid 70s. Rosenberg was a Marxist, who became very conventional. = What happened? Ian

Re: Re: method of economy

2002-02-09 Thread miyachi
on 2/10/02 06:57 AM, Michael Perelman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In reply to Rakesh's comments: First, I would accept a modifies largely not broken away. Michael, i think i disagree with both you and Shortall that Marx had not broken from what you are calling simple value analysis in

method of economy

2002-02-08 Thread miyachi
on 2/8/02 00:45 PM, Michael Perelman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will try again. miyachi wrote: on 2/7/02 08:25 AM, Michael Perelman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to send you my paper, but your mailbox is full. Excuse me. But my mailbox is not full!? [EMAIL PROTECTED] --