Re: Re: RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-14 Thread Jim Devine
I wrote: Of course. It should be remembered that the current war on drugs keeps the prices high, so that farmers and especially middlemen can benefit in a big way when taking the risk pays off. Andrew Austin writes: Are you arguing that there is a war on drugs so that opium farmers, etc. can

more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Jim Devine
another point. It should be remembered that the execrable Taliban was a exemplary partner in the evil War on Drugs and that the U.S. duly rewarded it for its good deed of suppressing opium production. (The Taliban seem to have that authoritarian knack.) If the Taliban is out of the picture --

RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Austin, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Jim Devine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:19587] more on the Northern Alliance another point. It should be remembered that the execrable Taliban was a exemplary partner in the evil War

Re: RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Michael Perelman
]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:19587] more on the Northern Alliance another point. It should be remembered that the execrable Taliban was a exemplary partner in the evil War on Drugs and that the U.S. duly rewarded it for its good deed

RE: Re: RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Austin, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Michael Perelman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] As I understand it, the Taliban is not involved in the Drug Trade, but they depend upon taxes that they levy from it. Nobody here is a fan of the Taliban. * * * I do not assume anyone here is a fan of the Taliban,

Re: RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Jim Devine
At 01:24 PM 11/13/01 -0600, you wrote: Do I detect jest in this post? The Taliban is involved in the drug trade. Officials in cities where production is heavy have publicly admitted they cannot control production and that they will not because they need the support and the farmers need the

RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Brownson, Jamil
-L:19587] more on the Northern Alliance another point. It should be remembered that the execrable Taliban was a exemplary partner in the evil War on Drugs and that the U.S. duly rewarded it for its good deed of suppressing opium production. (The Taliban seem to have that authoritarian knack

Re: RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Jim Devine
Jamil Brownson wrote: What are drugs to us may only be a crop to them [Afgans], and where poverty is grindingly real, any crop that has commercial value, and in this case also has tradition backing it up, is real, hence any global legality is immaterial. Of course. It should be remembered

RE: Re: RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread Austin, Andrew
-Original Message- From: Jim Devine Of course. It should be remembered that the current war on drugs keeps the prices high, so that farmers and especially middlemen can benefit in a big way when taking the risk pays off. * * * Are you arguing that there is a war on drugs so that opium

Re: Re: RE: more on the Northern Alliance

2001-11-13 Thread ALI KADRI
“The Taliban forbid kite flying, high heels, laughing and music, yet they run drugs and guns and enjoy lynching people.” Oddly enough, this is very similar to Calvinist Geneva: Children and or their parents were punished for laughing in the streets, families were fined if they cooked extra for