One thing that makes me hesitate on the left learning from the successful
right strategy and tactics is , as I mentioned, it might not have been
better strategy and tactics, but basically infinitely more money than the
real left that made the right's method work. The left activities from 1964
-74 w
> I think it was only one of the commandments, "Thou shalt [not]
> commit
> adultery."
How many God-fearing, Bible-thumping, people ran out and committed that
sin?
Jim Devine
"Devine, James" wrote:
>
> > I assuming the "not" in the fourth line from the end of
> > Jim's letter is a misprint, but overall it is a good question.
>
> Yeah, it was a typo. (It's sort of like the version of the Bible that
> allegedly _left out_ the "nots" in the Ten Commandments...)
> Jim Devi
> I assuming the "not" in the fourth line from the end of
> Jim's letter is a misprint, but overall it is a good question.
Yeah, it was a typo. (It's sort of like the version of the Bible that
allegedly _left out_ the "nots" in the Ten Commandments...)
Jim Devine
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/05 8:53 AM >>>
Michael Hoover :
-clip-
populist right's origins of
which are in the 'other 60s', so much bigger story than has generally
been recognized or acknowledged)...
^
CB: The "other 60's": I wonder if that is to suggest that while the left
likes to think of
Greetings Economists,
Overall Chris Burfords proposal for reconciliation is acceptable to me. I
can't speak for other disability oriented persons, but the call to integrate
feelings into the process is crucial to the movement for disabled rights in
my view. There is nothing to guarantee someone a
Michael Hoover :
-clip-
populist right's origins of
which are in the 'other 60s', so much bigger story than has generally
been recognized or acknowledged)...
^
CB: The "other 60's": I wonder if that is to suggest that while the left
likes to think of the "60's" as a left upsurge, in hindsigh
hat the left has to have a moral
as well as an economic and a political perspective.
Chris Burford
London
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Hoover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] moral framing, vision
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/25/05 2:12 PM >>>
Michael H's response was useful, but I was thinking more generally.
If the Left wants to revive, it needs a clear moral
perspective -- and a clear method of moral framing.
Sure, we can lambaste the establishment and its
system for hypocrisy and the like
From: Yoshie Furuhashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why can't American workers be like French
workers?
They lack that certain je ne sais quoi :)
Carl
At 11:12 AM -0800 3/25/05, Devine, James wrote:
Sure, we can lambaste the establishment and its system for hypocrisy
and the like. But what is our positive vision? Marx didn't help much
here, because his emphasis (perhaps rightly at the time) was almost
entirely a critique of capitalism.
What about
[was: RE: [PEN-L] another Schiavo irony]
Michael H's response was useful, but I was thinking more generally.
If the Left wants to revive, it needs a clear moral
perspective -- and a clear method of moral framing.
Sure, we can lambaste the establishment and its
system for hypocrisy and the l
12 matches
Mail list logo