revising MONOPOLY CAPITAL

[Jim Devine]

On Tuesday, Yoshie wrote: _Monopoly Capital_, etc. need to be revised. 

BTW, pen-pal Charlie Andrews' FROM CAPITALISM TO EQUALITY has some useful 
perspectives on Monopoly Capital, but he doesn't address the book at 
length. I wouldn't say that his book is as dramatic as MONOPOLY CAPITAL, 
but it's quite a useful treatise on the subject of the laws of motion of 
capitalism.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http:/bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. -- Richard Feynman.

RE: revising MONOPOLY CAPITAL

[michael pugliese]

   A dimissive retrospective review is in the Winter 1997 issue
of Dissent by ex-NAM member, Joanne Barkan. Much more negative
than the Robert Heilbroner review in the NYRB back in '66 or
'67. For a more positive review of Bran  Sweezy see Peter Clecak,
Radical Paradoxes; Dilemmas of the American Left, 1945-1970,
 Harper  Row, 1973. Also looks at C. Wright Mills and Marcuse.
Michael Pugliese
From: Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 7/5/01 11:31:18 AM


On Tuesday, Yoshie wrote: _Monopoly Capital_, etc. need to
be revised. 

BTW, pen-pal Charlie Andrews' FROM CAPITALISM TO EQUALITY has
some useful 
perspectives on Monopoly Capital, but he doesn't address the
book at 
length. I wouldn't say that his book is as dramatic as MONOPOLY
CAPITAL, 
but it's quite a useful treatise on the subject of the laws of
motion of 
capitalism.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http:/bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. -- Richard
Feynman.