On Feb 18, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Jonas Liljegren wrote:
Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
"Hard" and "soft" are definitely well-established terms for
describing bounces.
How about trying to define some terms?
I think what you're looking for is something like:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1893.ht
Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
"Hard" and "soft" are definitely well-established terms for
describing bounces. I think that "transient bounce" is a weird
choice, though. It's not a bounce, and if it was, a transient bounce
would sound, to me, like a soft bounce. It's just a DSN that isn't a
bounce repo
* Jonas Liljegren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-17T19:50:52]
> The MD::BounceParser seemed to bee a bit disorganized and had seems to
> have the assumption that you only would want to use it for finding out
> email-addresses to remove from send-lists.
That is definitely the reason it was made. It
