Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2019-05-16 Thread Ricardo Signes
* p...@cpan.org [2019-01-17T06:25:04] > I'm really disappointed as you have not wrote anything about this topic > as people are already there... I'm not dead. I am avoiding this list because I find your messages and attitude about it to be really off-putting, and whenever I come back, I feel

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2019-05-15 Thread pali
On Thursday 17 January 2019 12:25:04 p...@cpan.org wrote: > Hi Ricardo! > > On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote: > > So: you can wait for me to have more time, or people with some vested > > interest can agree to step up to do more in general. > > I'm really disappointed as you

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2019-01-17 Thread pali
Hi Ricardo! On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote: > So: you can wait for me to have more time, or people with some vested > interest can agree to step up to do more in general. I'm really disappointed as you have not wrote anything about this topic as people are already there...

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-11-20 Thread pali
On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote: > * p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32] > > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that > > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so. > > You are mistaken. > > The answer is the same as every other time you have

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-08-09 Thread pali
On Thursday 28 June 2018 13:03:58 p...@cpan.org wrote: > On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote: > > * p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32] > > > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that > > > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so. > > > > You are

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-06-28 Thread pali
On Monday 25 June 2018 08:31:08 Ricardo Signes wrote: > * p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32] > > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that > > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so. > > You are mistaken. > > The answer is the same as every other time you have

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-06-25 Thread Geraint Edwards
Marc Bradshaw via pep said (on Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 07:35:31p.m. +1000): > > > PS: Is somebody still active on this pep mailing list? > > Not active, but reading. +1 and can PR, etc -- Gedge

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-06-25 Thread Ricardo Signes
* p...@cpan.org [2018-06-25T05:08:32] > So what is status of Email::* modules? Does silence now mean that > modules are abandoned / unmaintained? I guess so. You are mistaken. The answer is the same as every other time you have asked: I am here, I am alive, I am interested, and I am extremely

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-06-25 Thread Marc Bradshaw via pep
> PS: Is somebody still active on this pep mailing list? Not active, but reading. -- Marc Bradshaw marcbradshaw.net[1] | @marcbradshaw[2] Links: 1. http://marcbradshaw.net/ 2. https://twitter.com/marcbradshaw

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-06-25 Thread Eric Wong
p...@cpan.org wrote: > PS: Is somebody still active on this pep mailing list? Mainly just a user, here. I won't ever use proprietary messaging platforms, but I can help out if stuff comes up on this list.

Re: Are Email::* modules unmaintained?

2018-06-25 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
Hi, The state of these modules differs, since they are not all maintained by the same person. For example, I only maintain Email::Outlook::Message. Of course, since that module depends on Email::MIME, my module is also affected by any lack of maintenance thereof. There are procedures in place for