Bilderberg, NATO, Rhodes & the Nazis: an idiots
guide to takeover of press & politics in the West
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrPqHtKyEEM>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrPqHtKyEEM
It’s the Beginning of the End of the Bilderberg Era
Like him or hate him, President Trump has played
a major part, if only by saying the unsayable.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/bilderberg-era-end/244731/
June 25th, 2018 By Alastair Crooke 141 Comments
https://www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=35
The beginning of the end of the Bilderberg/Soros
vision is in sight. The Old Order will cling on,
even to the last of its fingernails. The
Bilderberg vision is the notion of
multi-cultural, international cosmopolitanism
that surpasses old-time nationalism; heralding
the end of frontiers; and leading toward a
US-led, ‘technocratic’, global economic and
political governance. Its roots lie with figures
such as James Burnham, an anti-Stalin, former
Trotskyite, who, writing as early as 1941,
advocated for the levers of financial and
economic power being placedin the hands of a
management class: an élite – which alone would be
capable of running the contemporary state –
thanks to this élite’s market and financial
technical nous. It was, bluntly, a call for an expert, technocratic oligarchy.
Burnham renounced his allegiance to Trotsky and
Marxism, in all its forms in 1940, but he would
take the tactics and strategies for infiltration
and subversion, (learned as a member of Leon
Trotsky’s inner circle) with him, and would
elevate the Trotskyist management of ‘identity
politics’ to become the fragmentation ‘device’
primed to explode national culture onto a new
stage, in the Western sphere. His 1941 book, “The
Managerial Revolution,” caught the attention of
Frank Wisner, subsequently, a legendary CIA
figure, who saw in the works of Burnham and his
colleague a fellow Trotskyite, Sidney Hook, the
prospect of mounting an effective alliance of
former Trotskyites against Stalinism.
But, additionally, Wisner perceived its merits as
the blueprint for a CIA-led, pseudo-liberal,
US-led global order. (‘Pseudo’, because, as
Burnham articulated clearly, in The
Machiavellians, Defenders of Freedom, his version
of freedom meant anything but intellectual
freedom or those freedoms defined by America’s
Constitution. “What it really meant was conformity and submission”).
In short, (as Paul Fitzgerald and Elizabeth Gould
have noted), “by 1947, James Burnham’s
transformation from Communist radical, to New
World Order American conservative was complete.
His Struggle for the World, [converted into a
memo for the US Office of Strategic Services
(OSS, the forerunner of CIA)], had done a ‘French
Turn’ on Trotsky’s permanent Communist
revolution, and turned it into a permanent battle
plan for a global American empire. All that was
needed to complete Burnham’s dialectic was a
permanent enemy, and that would require a
sophisticated psychological campaign to keep the
hatred of Russia alive, “for generations”.
What has this to do with us today? A ‘Burnham
Landscape’ of apparently, ‘centrist’ European
political parties, apparently independent
think-tanks, institutions, and NATO structures,
was seeded by CIA – in the post war era of
anti-Sovietism – across Europe, and the Middle
East – as part of Burnham’s ‘battle plan’ for a
US-led, global ‘order’. It is precisely this
élite: i.e. Burnham’s oligarchic technocracy,
that is facing political push-back today to the
point at which the Liberal Order feels that it is
struggling for its very survival against “the
enemy in the White House”, as the editor of
Spiegel Online has termed President Trump.
What has caused this? Well, like him or hate him,
President Trump has played a major part, if only
by saying the unsayable. The rationality or not
inherent in these Eckhart-style ‘unsayings’, or
apophasis, is beside the point: Trump’s intuitive
‘discourse of saying the unsayable’ has taken
most of the bolts out of the former Burnham-type, ideological structure.
But in Europe, two main flaws to the Burnham
blueprint have contributed, possibly fatally, to
the blueprint crisis: Firstly, the policy of
populating Europe with immigrants, as a remedy
for Europe’s adverse demographics (and to dilute
to the point of erasure, its national cultures):
“Far from leading to fusion”, writes British
historian, Niall Ferguson, “Europe’s migration
crisis is leading to fission. The play might be
called The Meltdown Pot … Increasingly … the
issue of migration will be seen by future
historians as the fatal solvent of the EU. In
their accounts Brexit will appear as merely an
early symptom of the crisis”. And secondly, the
bi-furcation of the economy into two unrelated,
and dis-equal economies, as a result of the
élite’s mismanagement of the global economy,
(i.e. the obvious the absence of ‘prosperity for all’).
Trump evidently has heard the two key messages
from his constituency: that they neither accept
to have (white) American culture, and its
way-of-life, diluted through immigration; and,
neither do they wish – stoically – to accommodate
to America’s eclipse by China.
The issue of how to arrest China’s rise is
primordial (for Team Trump), and in a certain
sense, has led to an American ‘retrospective’:
America now may only account for 14% of global
output (PPP – Purchasing Power Parity basis), or
22%, on a nominal basis (as opposed to near half
of global output, for which the US was
responsible, at the close of WW2), but American
corporations, thanks to the dollar global
hegemony, enjoy a type of monopoly status (i.e.
Microsoft, Google and Facebook, amongst others),
either through regulatory privilege, or by
marketplace dominance. Trump wants to halt this
asset from decaying further and to leverage it
again as a potent bargaining chip in the present
tariff wars. This is clearly a political ‘winner’
in terms of US domestic grass-roots, politics,
and the upcoming November mid-term elections.
The second strand seems to be something of a
Middle East ‘retrospective’: to restore the
Middle East to the era of The Shah, when ‘Persia’
policed the Middle East; when Israel was a
regional ‘power’ implementing the American
interest; and when the major sources of energy
were under US control. And, further, when Russian
influence was being attenuated, by leveraging
radical Sunni Islam against Arab socialism, and nationalism.
Of course, Trump is savvy enough to know that it
is not possible to revert wholly to that
Kissinger-esque world. The region has changed too
much for that. But Kissinger remains an
influential adviser to the President (together
with PM Netanyahu). And it is easy to forget that
US dominance of the Middle East brought America
not just control of energy, but the re-cycling of
petrodollars into Wall Street, and the necklace
of US military bases in the Gulf that both
surround Iran, and give to the US its military muscle, reaching into Asia.
We have therefore Trump’s hugging of MBS, MBZ and
Netanyahu, and a supporting narrative of Iran as
a ‘malign actor’ in the region, and a facilitator of terrorism.
But, it is just a ‘narrative’, and it is
nonsense, when put into a broader understanding
of the regional context. The history of Islam has
never been free from violent conflict (going back
to earliest days: i.e. the Wars of the Ridda, or
apostasy 632-3 etc.). But – lest we forget – this
present era of Sunni radicalization (such as has
given birth to ISIS) reaches back, at least, to
the 17th and 18th Centuries, with the Ottoman
disaster at the Gates of Vienna (1683); the
consequent onset of the Caliphate dissolution;
growing Ottoman permissiveness and sensuality,
provoking Abd-el Wahhab’s radical zealotism (on
which basis Saudi Arabia was founded); and
finally the aggressive westernizing secularism in
Turkey and Persia, which triggered what is called
‘political Islam’ (both Sunni and Shi’a that
initially, were united, in a single movement).
The MBS narrative that Saudi Arabia’s
‘fundamentalism’ was a reaction to the Iranian
Revolution is yet another ‘meme’ that may serve
Trump and Netanyahu’s interests, but is just as
false. The reality is that the modern Arab
(Sunni) system, a holdover from the Ottoman era,
has been in a long term channel of decline since
WW1 – whereas Shi’i Islam is enjoying a strong
revival across the northern tier of the Middle
East, and beyond. Put rather bluntly: the
Iranians are on the upside of history – it’s as simple as that.
And what Trump is trying to do is Iranian
capitulation, in the face of the
American-Israeli-Saudi siege, the key to undoing
Obama (again), by trying to reassert US Middle
East dominance, energy dominance and an Israeli
resurgence of regional power. Subjugating Iran
thus has emerged as the supreme litmus for
re-establishing the unipolar global order.
It is so iconic precisely because, just as much
as Trump would like to see Iran, Iraq and Iranian
allies everywhere, fall to the unipolar hegemony,
Iran is as central to the multipolar vision of Xi
and Putin as it is iconic to Trump’s putative
Middle East ‘makeover’. And it is not just
symbolic: Iran is as pivotal to both Russian and
Chinese geo-political strategies. In a word, Iran
has more leverage to ensure survival than Trump may have anticipated.
America will leverage its dominance of the
financial system to the limit to strangle Iran,
and China and Russia will do what is necessary
financially, and in terms of trade, to see that
Iran does not implode economically – and remains
a pillar of the multipolar alternative world order.
And it is here that the paradigm shifts in Europe
come into play. It is not, I repeat not because
Europe can be expected to show leadership or to
‘do’ much, but rather because the apophatic
discourse of ‘saying the unsayable’ is spreading
to Europe. It has not, so far, changed the
paradigm of power, but may soon (i.e. with
Merkel’s possible political demise). Germany may
be more staid in its politics than Italy, but the
voice of Italy’s new Interior Minister, Matteo
Salvini, saying ‘no’ to the ‘Burnham’ proxies in
Berlin is echoing across Europe, and beyond. It acts like a slap in the face.
Let us be absolutely clear: We are not suggesting
that Europe will expend political capital in
defending the JCPOA. That is not likely. We are
saying that America’s dollar hegemony has proved
toxic to the rest of the world in very many ways,
and Trump – in leveraging that hegemony so
gangsterishly: “We’re America, Bitch”, as one
official described America’s approach – is
fueling antagonism towards dollar hegemony (if
not yet towards America per se). It is pushing
all of non-America into a common stance of
rebellion against America’s unipolar financial dominance.
This ‘revolt’ is already giving leverage to Kim
Jong Un, as the Washington Post reports:
“With U.S.-China trade ties on the rocks, Kim is
well-positioned to play both powers, talking
sweet to Trump while pursuing a closer
relationship with Xi…Kim understands the
hierarchy. He knows that Xi is the Asian
Godfather,” said Yanmei Xie, a China policy
analyst at Gavekal Dragonomics, an economic
research firm in Beijing. “He is making a
pragmatic calculation that China can provide
economic assistance to integrate North Korea
diplomatically and economically into Northeast Asia …
“There is a regional effort, a sort of Northeast
Asia coalition of make-believe, to maintain the
fiction that the North Korea will de-nuke as long
as Americans keep talking to it,” Xie said.
China is less focused on getting Kim to give away
his weapons than on getting him to fall into
line. It may eventually use trade and investment
to keep him onside, experts said.
“With North Korea still struggling under U.N.
sanctions, “China’s political and economic
support is still highly important,” said Zhao
Tong, a North Korea expert at the
Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy in
Beijing. Zhao said the question now is: “How can
China help North Korea develop its economy?”
“China can also help Kim normalize North Korea’s
diplomatic status. That starts with treating him
less like a rogue dictator and more like a visiting statesman.”
The same goes for Iran — in spades. China and
Russia know how to play this game of ‘chicken’.
Top Photo | An activist protests near the meeting
place for the conference of the Bilderberg Group
meeting in Sitges, Spain, Thursday, June 3, 2010.
The Bilderberg Group is an unofficial conference
of around 130 invitation-only guests who are
insiders in politics, banking, business, military
and the media. The group’s meetings are held in
secret and are closed to the public. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)
Strategic Culture Foundation
NB please do reply with remove as the subject or
first line if you do not wish to recieve further emails - thanks
'From South America, where payment must be made
with subtlety, the Bormann organization has made
a substantial contribution. It has drawn many of
the brightest Jewish businessmen into a
participatory role in the development of many of
its corporations, and many of these Jews share
their prosperity most generously with Israel. If
their proposals are sound, they are even provided
with a specially dispensed venture capital fund.
I spoke with one Jewish businessmen in Hartford,
Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown
several years before our conversation, but with
Bormann money as his leverage. Today he is more
than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the
community with a certain share of his profits
earmarked as always for his venture capital
benefactors. This has taken place in many other
instances across America and demonstrates how
Bormann’s people operate in the contemporary
commercial world, in contrast to the fanciful
nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much “literature.”
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish
participation in Bormann companies that when
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires.
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen
again because a repetition would permanently
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin
America, as well as with the Bormann
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most
efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.'
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
TG mobile +44 7786 952037
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.