The Alternative Skripal Narrative
https://thesaker.is/the-alternative-skripal-narrative/
15285 ViewsFebruary 17, 2019
<https://thesaker.is/the-alternative-skripal-narrative/#comments>63 Comments
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=178520#178520
by Michael Antony for The Saker Blog
The recent titbit fed to us by Bellingcat
(reputedly close to MI6) that a third Russian
agent was booked on the flight from Heathrow to
Moscow on the night of 4th March 2018 the
flight taken by the two alleged GRU officers
filmed in Salisbury but didn’t show up for it,
has pointed to a possible solution to the
baffling Skripal puzzle. What if the third man,
or perhaps the man who was supposed to take his
place, was by then lying in Salisbury Hospital in
a coma from opiate poisoning? What if Sergei
Skripal was a triple agent trying to escape back
to Russia to tell the world the truth about the
Steele Dossier, which he had helped to concoct as
a scurrilous, obscene joke and which had
unexpectedly become the new bible of the insane war party in Washington?
This is the alternative narrative I will set out
in detail here so that the reader can judge
whether it forms a more plausible and coherent
story than the mishmash of improbabilities,
absurdities and contradictions served up by the
British police and MI6. Of course in the absence
of all the facts we must sometimes use
imaginative reconstruction to fill in the gaps,
but the point is to see how many thorny problems,
raised by the facts we do have, can be solved by
this narrative and cannot be solved by the official one.
It is not necessary to decide whether Skripal was
a triple agent from the start (that is, a plant
sent across in a spy swap, a classic Cold War way
of infiltrating the enemy) or whether he became a
triple agent when he realized how important this
grotesque Steele Dossier had become and how much
the Russians would pay him to come back and
demolish it. What evidence there is (his phone
call in 2012 to his old school friend, Vladimir
Timoshkov, whose account of it three weeks after
the poisoning gained widespread UK media
coverage) suggests he started out as a purely
mercenary traitor. Disillusioned by the collapse
of the USSR into a gangster capitalist state run
by Yeltsin’s mafia cronies, he decided he might
as well profit from it by selling the corpse of
what had once been his country to the highest
bidder. The Russians didn’t seem to think of him
as much more than a common criminal (only worth a
moderate 13-year sentence, instead of the death
penalty he would have got in the USA for
betraying 300 agents) or they wouldn’t have let
him survive six years in their prison. Perhaps
when they exchanged him in the spy swap they gave
him a wink and said: “Since you’re just a
money-grubbing whore, any time you want to come
back with some interesting stuff learned from
working for MI6, let us know and we’ll discuss the price.”
He soon got to learn that interesting stuff when
he was sent to Salisbury, the home town of his
MI6 recruiter and handler, Pablo Miller. Miller
had recruited him in Spain in 1995 and later
handled him from Estonia, when he was posted
there as a diplomat. It is a little too much to
believe Skripal’s move to Salisbury was a
coincidence. The two men became friends again,
met regularly in the pub, and there is every
reason to think Miller resumed his role as
handler. Miller was now working for Christopher
Steele, his old boss at MI6, in his private
intelligence firm, Orbis Business Intelligence,
based in Mayfair. This is one of the private
intelligence-gathering outfits run by ex-spies of
the kind Litvinenko used to work for. Just as
Litvinenko got Lugovoy (his accused assassin) to
help him out with due diligence reports on
Russian businessmen because of his more
up-to-date information, so Miller would have used
Skripal in the same way. His help became vital
when Steele got the commission from the
Democratic Party to dig up Russian dirt on Donald
Trump, and they had to invent some GRU set-up of
the Donald with prostitutes in a Moscow hotel.
Miller, the old Russia hand, would have done a
good part of the work on this dossier and would
have needed all the authentic detail his Russian
agent could provide. Perhaps it was Skripal who
came up with the scenario of Trump getting
prostitutes to urinate on the bed the Obamas had
slept in, which hidden cameras filmed. He must at
least have given it his imprimatur as a typical
GRU blackmail ploy to turn somebody into an
asset. And that obscene fiction, the core of the
Steele Dossier, became the basis of the neo-con
legend that Trump was a Russian stooge the
insane underpinning of the whole mad Mueller probe into “Russian collusion”.
When Sergei the mercenary realized the vast
importance this farcical, obscene Steele Dossier
had taken on, that it was gospel truth for the
whole anti-Trump, anti-Russia war party in
Washington, he began to see how much it might be
worth to the Russian state to blow it sky-high.
If he were to describe on a prime-time Russian
talk-show how he invented these obscene details
over a beer with Miller and Steele in a pub, it
would not only have all of Russia rolling on the
floor with laughter. Heads would roll in
Washington. The neo-con war party would become a
laughing-stock. MI6 would be run out of town.
Steele might face FBI perjury charges. The CIA
might have its budget cut. Trump would be able to
talk to Putin again. And the rewards for Sergei
might be considerable. Not only seeing his
90-year old mother again, but perhaps even a
swanky villa with a sea-view in Crimea or Sochi
instead of that dank, shabby row-house in darkest Salisbury.
Was it Sergei who broached this subject to Yulia
on one of her visits to Britain, or was she
recruited by the GRU to put it to him? My bet is
the latter, since after the poisoning her cousin
Viktoria claimed Yulia’s new boyfriend and his
mother both worked for the Russian secret
services (before disappearing from view.) With
all of Sergei’s communications monitored by MI6,
the only way he had of talking to the GRU was
through his daughter, living back in Russia again
but able to visit Britain. Through her he must
have managed to negotiate a deal for his return.
Somehow MI6 got wind of their plans perhaps
Yulia, not a trained spy, was a bit naive or
careless about listening devices. Steele became
convinced they had made an escape plan for
Sergei, to be carried out next time she visited Salisbury.
The thing that proves this was a British crime
not a Russian one is the fact that Yulia was a
prime target. The Russians had no motive to
eliminate her, but if they had, they could have
done it in Russia with a simple road accident
with no questions asked. Only the British had to
do it in Britain, since they didn’t have the
resources in place to do it in Russia. And if she
was not a prime target but collateral damage, why
was Sergei not attacked when he was alone? Why
wait for her to visit him? The fact they were
both targeted the day after she arrived in
Britain puts MI6’s signature all over it. She was
a danger to MI6 because she knew of Sergei’s plan
to return to Russia and trash the Steele Dossier,
and she had to be stopped from revealing this to
the world when he was killed. Silencing her at
the same time was just as important to MI6 as silencing him.
To imagine that Putin would have ordered the
assassination of an old double agent whom he had
held for six years in prison (with ample
opportunities to arrange his death) and then
pardoned and swapped in a spy swap (part of the
rules of the spying game on which his own life
had been based), a week before the Russian
elections and three months before the Football
World Cup in Russia, which he hoped would lead to
Russia’s re-acceptance into the community of
nations, makes no sense. It carried only huge
risks for a negligible benefit, and Putin does
not take pointless risks, as his consistent
prudence in Syria, even when his forces have been
attacked, has shown. Compare the enormous gains
this crime brought Britain. This assassination
(as it was meant to be) gave MI6 a perfect
opportunity to frame the Russians and incite a
new anti-Russia frenzy to sabotage their
celebratory Football World Cup (compared by the
British Foreign Secretary to Hitler’s Olympics.)
It would also show the EU Britain’s value as an
anti-Putin cheerleader, bringing Europe and
Britain together in an anti-Russia hate-week to
distract from their Brexit quarrel, and uniting a
fractious parliament behind a floundering leader.
With any luck it would derail the Nordstream2 gas
pipeline, a priority target for the US neo-con
plan to ruin Russia’s economy, overthrow the
regime and break up the country goals MI6 fully
shared, as their propaganda wing, the Integrity
Initiative, has since made clear. In fact MI6’s
plans to work for the total isolation and
economic ruin of Russia, including sporting bans
and ending cultural exchanges, date from 2015 and
were leaked recently by Anonymous. The enormous
preponderance of motivation on the British side,
as well as the low risk in carrying out such a
crime on their own turf with a grovelling press,
a brainwashed public and tame police, point clearly to MI6 as the perpetrators.
Steele probably turned to his CIA friends for
suggestions on how to frame Russia. They came up
with novichok. This nerve agent invented by a
Soviet chemist who later moved to the US and
published the formula could be pinned on Russia
as a uniquely Russian “chemical weapon.” Never
mind that any decent laboratory could produce it,
as a chemistry professor at Cornell has
testified. Never mind that the British-invented
nerve agent VX had been used to assassinate Kim
Yong-Un’s half-brother in Kuala Lumpur Airport
without Malaysia screaming that Britain must have
done it. Russia is different. Hysterical hatred
can be instantly incited against Russia by the
MI6-controlled media and MI6-brainwashed
politicians. Anyone who doubts Russia’s guilt can
be vilified as a Putin stooge. Whether the
novichok was sent over from the US by courier or
produced at Porton Down is not important. What is
important is that MI6’s attempt to kill the
Skripals with novichok failed disastrously.
Let’s take the famous Nina Ricci perfume bottle,
laced with novichok, which was found in a rubbish
bin or charity bin by a homeless man and given
weeks later to his woman friend, who tragically
died after spraying it on her wrist. The
police/MI6 narrative is that this perfume bottle
was used to transport the novichok from Russia in
the baggage of one of the alleged GRU men caught
on CCTV in Salisbury. The novichok was then
sprayed on the door handle of the Skripals’
house. The assassins then callously threw away
the bottle (which they knew contained enough
novichok to kill more people) in a dustbin or
charity bin, demonstrating their indifference to
loss of life as well as their indifference to
leaving clues all over the place. There are problems with this narrative.
The homeless man claimed he had found the perfume
bottle still in its box sealed in cellophane,
proof it was not reopened after it had been laced
with novichok and professionally repackaged. The
bottle could not therefore have been used (as
claimed) to spray the novichok on the doorknob,
or the cellophane seal would have been broken.
Assassins far from home don’t usually carry
around cellophane-wrapping machines to repackage
opened perfume bottles, especially when they are
just going to chuck them in the bin. Nor would
they take the risk, having fitted the separate
spray nozzle onto the bottle and sprayed the
doorknob, of disassembling it again to put it
back in the box, knowing that a drop on their
skin would kill them. And where would they
perform this delicate operation? On the street?
This poisoned perfume bottle was therefore never
reopened, never used and it affected nobody until
it ended up in the hands of the homeless man. So
who or what was it intended for?
Ladies’ perfume bottles are normally intended for
women. How many women are there in this story?
Only one. The only possible explanation for the
existence of this unopened, unused bottle of
perfume laced with novichok is that it was a
poisoned gift meant for Yulia Skripal. Why didn’t
she open it? Because she had a spy father who
took one look at it and said: “Don’t touch it!”
So here is the alternative narrative. MI6 had the
bright idea of putting novichok in a Nina Ricci
perfume bottle and sending it as a birthday
present to Yulia Skripal at her father’s house.
Her birthday was on 17th March, but the present
was probably delivered on the 3rd, the day she
arrived, so as to nip their escape plan in the
bud. It was meant to seem like a present from her
family or boyfriend. No doubt the parcel had
Russian stamps on it, designed to frame the
Russian state when the Skripals were found dead
in their house with an open perfume bottle in
Yulia’s hands. Unfortunately for MI6, Sergei took
one look at this Nina Ricci perfume bottle and
his spy instincts smelled danger. He refused to
open it, but instead went for a long walk with it
and put it in a rubbish bin or charity bin
half-way across town. There it was found by the
homeless man and given to his woman friend, a
victim of MI6’s murderous callousness. Even after
MI6 knew it had gone missing, they did not warn
the public to beware of picking up a Nina Ricci
perfume bottle because they didn’t want to give
themselves away as the assassins.
The failure of the perfume bottle to kill the
Skripals must have alarmed MI6. They followed the
pair around Salisbury the next day. Where did
they go? We can’t be sure since we have not been
given all the CCTV footage. But let us engage in
some more imaginative reconstruction to cover the
gaps. The Skripals’ car made some unexplained
journeys towards the outskirts of the town. The
two alleged GRU men caught on Salisbury’s CCTV
walked in some unexplained directions, with not a
scrap of evidence they came within half a
kilometre of the Skripals’ home. What if the two
unexplained journeys intersected? Not necessarily
in time but in place. What if they met at that
hoary cliché of spy stories, the dead drop, the
discreet delivery point for a package? The
hole-in-a-garden-wall just big enough to hide
something? A Mossad spy, commenting on the
British police narrative, said that no GRU
assassination team would ever have flown direct
from Russia using Russian passports. But a
support team delivering a package? Why not? What did they risk?
Now what would the GRU need to deliver to Sergei
Skripal to help him escape from Britain back to
Russia? Clearly, a passport. MI6, once they
suspected his loyalty, would have put him on an
airport watch list. He would need a passport in a
false name to get out, and perhaps a flight
ticket to Moscow in the same name so he wouldn’t
need to make an internet booking, easily spied
on. But the passport could not be blank. It
needed a UK visa and entry stamp. So the third
Russian agent who Bellingcat now tells us didn’t
show up for the flight back to Moscow must have
intended his seat to be taken by Sergei Skripal,
who would use the passport and visa which he had
flown in with a few days before (delivered to
Sergei by his two colleagues at the dead drop
that day.) Either Sergei and the third man bore a
sufficient physical resemblance or passport
photos were switched by an expert forger in
London. Unfortunately, though Sergei now had a
usable passport, he was hit before he made it to the flight.
MI6, after the failure of the perfume bottle
attempt, knew they had to act fast to stop the
Skripals driving to the airport. Once they
observed the package delivery at the dead drop,
they would have guessed it was a passport. There
was now no chance of using novichok. The Skripals
were unlikely to return home and pack a bag, so
they had to be knocked out in a public place.
Using novichok and risking the lives of dozens of
other people was too much even for MI6. So they
decided to spray them in the street with an
opiate like Fentanyl, and later on to add
novichok to the blood samples they sent to Porton
Down for analysis (without of course any
controlled chain of custody except their own.)
We know that the Skipals were knocked out with an
opiate and not a nerve agent because of a simple
incident in fact, a slip-up. The first person
on the scene when the Skripals collapsed on their
bench was an army nurse, the Chief Nursing
Officer of the British Army, Colonel Alison
McCourt, accompanied by her teenage daughter,
Abigail. Does anyone believe she was there by
chance and was not part of the MI6 team following
the Skripals about and looking for an opportunity
to drug them discreetly? Now Colonel McCourt had
long experience both with Ebola in Sierra Leone
and with the danger of chemical weapons during
her service in Iraq, where protection against
nerve agents was a priority. She knew the
enormous precautions required in approaching a
victim of a nerve agent attack. Yet Colonel
McCourt encouraged her daughter to rush over to
the collapsed Skripals and begin administering
first aid to them, something very dangerous if a
nerve agent had been used. She later even
recommended Abigail for a medal for heroism for
her action, which is why it got into the papers.
How did Colonel McCourt know that a nerve agent
had not been used on the Skripals, unless she was
part of the team that had sprayed them with an
opiate? Would she have allowed her daughter to
touch the Skipals unless she was sure there was
no nerve agent present? This is what is known as a smoking gun.
There has been extraordinary silence in the
mainstream media about the fact that none of the
first responders or the Salisbury Hospital staff
were in any way affected by the deadliest nerve
agent known to man, even though no precautions
were taken against it for at least two days. The
nurses assumed they were dealing with an opiate
overdose. When the blood test results came back
from Porton Down showing novichok present in the
blood samples, the hazmat suits were donned and
the hospital allegedly went into panic mode. We
can assume most of this was a charade. Sergeant
Bailey, allegedly contaminated with novichok
though the police can’t decide where, recounts in
the Panorama BBC film shown in November that the
nurses who cared for him wore full hazmat suits,
but his wife and children wandered in to see him
wearing no protection at all. Clearly the nurses
were engaging in an MI6-mandated charade but
couldn’t bear to impose it on his family because
they knew there was no novichok present. Bailey,
no doubt also drugged by an opiate, had been
selected as a fake British victim to stir up more
indignation against Russia, and to add further
fake proof that novichok had been used, which the
total absence of contamination of first
responders might cast doubt on. As part of this
charade, all the poor man’s furniture and
belongings were destroyed by the heartless brutes
of MI6, which he recounts in tears, in order to
incite more irrational hatred of Russia which
the British public, the most brainwashed on earth, came up with on cue.
Of course the failure of the perfume bottle
assassination attempt, and the need to switch
drugs and use an opiate instead of novichok, left
MI6 and the police with the task of explaining
how the phantom novichok was administered. The
farcical story they finally came up with, that it
was sprayed on the Skripals’ front door handle
with the perfume bottle, has convinced nobody
except the brainwashed masses. Even the clownish
Foreign Secretary’s story that MI6 had shown him
a Russian spy handbook which described how their
spies had recently been practising putting
novichok on door handles (a technical skill
obviously requiring weeks of training and about
to be unleashed en masse against Britain’s
unsuspecting doorknobs) but unfortunately he
couldn’t produce this handbook as it was
classified, left people howling with laughter. It
was worthy of a Monty Python sketch, something
the Russians, who are great fans of British comedy, must have appreciated.
The idea that assassins could walk up to the
front door of a terraced house in broad daylight,
a door with clear glass panels in the middle and
on both sides of it, so that anyone outside is
visible from the hallway, and spray the doorknob
with novichok while the Skripals were inside and
their car was in the driveway, is simply not
believable. These professional assassins did not
even have a car or even bicycles to make a
getaway if seen. And the two police versions of
what time the attackers did this, first of all at
9.15 before the Skripals left home and then at
1.30 (after the police revised their timeline to
fit the train schedule of the two Russians caught
on CCTV) would both have left many hours’ delay
before this deadly nerve agent took effect at 4.15 that afternoon.
We are asked to believe that two people of very
different size, a man of 66 and a girl half that
age, fell unconscious at the exact same moment
either seven hours or three hours after being
poisoned with a deadly “military grade” nerve
agent. Why this delayed effect? Would this be
useful in a battlefield chemical weapon let’s
leave the enemy active for several hours? And how
to get a simultaneous collapse many hours later?
No explanation. And if novichok was used to
attack the Skripals, why was Abigail McCourt not
affected when she gave them first aid and why did
her highly trained army nurse mother allow her to
touch victims of a deadly nerve agent?
The intelligent people who work in Salisbury
Hospital cannot possibly be dupes to this
grotesque deception, riddled with
impossibilities. They are therefore accomplices
and criminally responsible. I believe many of the
hospital staff suspected MI6 was staging this
whole thing but went along with it because of the
high level of Cold War, anti-Russian brainwashing
of the British population. They saw it as an
exciting spy game they were taking part in with
their wonderful secret services who had Won the
War and Saved the World. It was a question of
loyalty to Britain to defend this criminal lie.
They must have suspected the Skripals’ blood
samples had been laced afterwards with novichok.
Perhaps the OPCW did too, since they claimed the
traces of novichok were “very pure”. Was that a
hint it had never been through any human body?
One can sympathize with the Russians for trying
to hack the laboratory computers to find out if
any of the experts had expressed doubts to each
other or suspicions the OPCW had set this up.
Since they knew they were victims of a shameless
NATO conspiracy to frame them, all they could do
was try to expose it by any means they had.
The Russians’ patience and calm in the face of
this campaign of lies and hate have been almost
saint-like. If the West is not wiped out by the
nuclear war they are constantly pushing for with
Russia, then one day Britain and all the other
NATO vassal states which wrongfully expelled
droves of Russian diplomats will have to make
Russia an abject apology and pay compensation for
the misery caused the Russian people by their
illegal sanctions. Is it too much to hope that
some people at Salisbury Hospital or in the local
police who know the truth will have the courage
sooner or later to come forward and expose this
vile warmongering deception, and the totalitarian
media manipulation by the sinister forces that
secretly govern Britain? Do they spare a thought
for the Skripals and the state they are in right
now held incommunicado without any charge
against them, not represented by any lawyer, and
unable to communicate with their family or the
public? Surely they are not fooled by that
scripted video? Where are the human rights
campaigners protesting against this totalitarian
sequestration? What world are they living in? Has
it not occurred to them that in the era of MI6’s
proven involvement in torture, whether in
Guantanamo, Abu Graib, black sites or
extraordinary rendition to places where people
can be tortured to death, Yulia Skripal might be
listening every night to her father whimpering in
the next cell as the voice goes on repeating:
“You Ruskie bastard, tell us when you started lying to us.”
The official narrative about the Skripals has
been shot full of holes by various dissident
commentators in the alternative media. That
always begs the question: well, so what really
happened? The above alternative narrative,
combining both the known facts and speculations
to cover the gaps where the facts are still
missing, should allow the reader to judge its
overall plausibility, compared to the official
one. To prove an alternative narrative to the
criminal’s story, a prosecutor does not need to
establish every single event in the chain, many
of which will remain unknown. He only needs to
prove that certain key events in the criminal’s
narrative are contrary to the known facts, and
that these facts are compatible with the
alternative narrative. The key facts in this case
are the state of the Nina Ricci perfume bottle,
clearly never opened after it was laced with
novichok and repackaged, and therefore never used
to spray novichok anywhere; the impossibility of
a deadly nerve agent having a three hour delay in
its effects and then affecting two very different
people at the same moment; the unlikelihood of a
senior army nurse allowing her daughter to touch
victims of a nerve agent; the unlikelihood
novichok was used (rather than an opiate), given
the lack of any effect on the first responders,
and the fact Sergeant Bailey’s children were
allowed to approach him without wearing hazmat
suits, which the nurses, however, wore.
Put those basic problems in the official
narrative together with the speed with which the
UK government blamed Russia for this event, when
there was no more link between Russia and
novichok than between Britain and the use of
British-invented VX nerve agent to assassinate
Kim Yong Un’s half-brother in Kuala Lumpur
airport. No nerve agent whose formula has been
published is the monopoly of any nation, nor does
its use incriminate any nation. This rush to
judgment reveals a premeditated plan by Britain
to use this event to sabotage Russia’s Football
World Cup (which they compared to Hitler’s
Olympics) as part of a long-term British goal to
isolate, discredit and economically ruin Russia.
The need for MI6 to prevent Skripal exposing the
Steele Dossier, produced by Skripal’s MI6
handlers, since it would show the degree of
Britain’s cynical interference in the American
election to discredit Trump and destroy any
rapprochement with Russia, formed the motive for
MI6 to commit murder, for which it has a
considerable reputation. Combining the two
things, killing the Skripals and crucifying
Russia for it, was no doubt seen as a great coup
by MI6. It was seen as even more ingenious to
follow up this alleged “chemical weapons” attack
on British soil with the fake chemical attack at
Douma staged by the White Helmets, founded and
financed by MI6. This was aimed at relaunching
the war to overthrow Assad and dismantle Syria,
giving the Americans and the Israelis its oil
fields, and allowing Qatari gas to be piped to
Europe to replace Russian gas. All of these fit
Britain’s and NATO’s known strategic goals. The
speed of the knee-jerk response of NATO countries
in expelling Russian diplomats, without any
debate or demand for evidence in any parliament,
raises the suspicion that this was planned not by
MI6 alone but jointly with the CIA and other NATO
secret services, which largely control supposedly democratic governments.
The continued NATO harassment, sanctions and
campaigns of lies and false accusations against
Russia, including the blatant war rhetoric of the
British Defence Secretary, do not bode well for
the future. For the US to tear up nuclear arms
treaties and then blame Russia is beyond
shameful: it is destroying all possibility of
negotiations to avert war. The Kerch Strait
incident staged by the puppet regime in Kiev,
sending gunboats into the Kerch Strait without
observing the 2003 Protocol requiring them to
notify in advance the Port of Kerch (a protocol
observed by the dozens of ships that go through
the Strait peacefully every day) was clearly part
of a NATO plan to set up a major naval clash in
the Black Sea. That clash (followed by an attempt
to recapture Crimea or at least blow up its
magnificent bridge, a reproach to a man who
cannot even build a wall) may be expected in
coming months, perhaps as a distraction from
Brexit or a way of derailing it. NATO, in short,
is on a clear trajectory towards war with Russia,
which their deluded worldview convinces them they
can win. Their initial use of Russia as a
scapegoat and bogeyman to unite the NATO vassals
against a common threat, keeping Europe in
subjection to America, has got out of hand, and
is heading, under the impetus of hysterical
rhetoric, towards actual war. Unless decent
people unite to stop this escalation then the
nuclear catastrophe will occur. Exposing the
barefaced lie of the Skripal false flag attack
may be a step towards averting that global cataclysm.
Michael Antony is a writer based in Switzerland,
and his next book, about the coming nuclear war,
is called Requiem for America. He has a blog, michaelantonyb...@wordpress.com
NB please do reply with remove as the subject or
first line if you do not wish to recieve further emails - thanks
'From South America, where payment must be made
with subtlety, the Bormann organization has made
a substantial contribution. It has drawn many of
the brightest Jewish businessmen into a
participatory role in the development of many of
its corporations, and many of these Jews share
their prosperity most generously with Israel. If
their proposals are sound, they are even provided
with a specially dispensed venture capital fund.
I spoke with one Jewish businessmen in Hartford,
Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown
several years before our conversation, but with
Bormann money as his leverage. Today he is more
than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the
community with a certain share of his profits
earmarked as always for his venture capital
benefactors. This has taken place in many other
instances across America and demonstrates how
Bormann’s people operate in the contemporary
commercial world, in contrast to the fanciful
nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much “literature.”
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish
participation in Bormann companies that when
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires.
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen
again because a repetition would permanently
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin
America, as well as with the Bormann
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most
efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.'
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk
http://www.bilderberg.org
http://www.tlio.org.uk
You can donate to support Tony's work here http://www.bilderberg.org/bcfm.htm
TG mobile +44 7786 952037
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.