Arnaldo,
I think the -n option of perf report shows bogus number of samples.
I believe it does not print the number of samples but rather the
number of events if I understand the code in hist_entry__snprintf().
I think that's useless, the number of samples is more useful.
$ perf report -h
usag
Peter,
See comments below.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Compile tested only, depends on the cgroup::exit patch
>
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -905,6 +929,9 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
> struct
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:20:01PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > The following patch is necessary to compile without NEWT.
>
> Merged already, Borislav Petkov sent a similar patch.
I just pushed it out - Stephane, mind checking that latest -tip indee
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
>> Em Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:20:01PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> > The following patch is necessary to compile without NEWT.
>>
>> Merged already, Borislav Petkov sent a similar patch.
>
> I just
Em Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 02:20:01PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> The following patch is necessary to compile without NEWT.
Merged already, Borislav Petkov sent a similar patch.
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian
> ---
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools
The following patch is necessary to compile without NEWT.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
index b1253aa..bc08b36 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int symbol__tty_ann
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:28 -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> >
>> > Make the ::exit method act like ::attach, it is after all very nearly
>> > the same thing.
>>
>> The major difference b
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 17:20 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> * Peter Zijlstra [2011-02-02 12:29:20]:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:39 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:30 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> > > > @@
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Also, the core cgroup code should deal with the cgroup refcount, not
> individual controllers.
Right, that's what I meant - make it so that an rmdir that fails
because a subsystem is still holding a refcount puts/leaves the cgroup
in a st
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Make the ::exit method act like ::attach, it is after all very nearly
> the same thing.
The major difference between attach and exit is that the former is
only triggered in response to user cgroup-management action, whereas
the latter is t
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 13:21 -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:28 -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Make the ::exit method act like ::attach, it is a
11 matches
Mail list logo
