Re: [perfmon2] Strangeness

2009-04-20 Thread stephane eranian
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nagy Mostafa wrote: > Hi, > JK -- Yes, they are not compatible but still they shouldn't contradict each > other. > I realized I am missing the "-u" flag later on. I mistakenly thought "-k" > means kernel + user mode. What still puzzles me is that although I was > s

Re: [perfmon2] Strangeness

2009-04-20 Thread Nagy Mostafa
Hi, JK -- Yes, they are not compatible but still they shouldn't contradict each other. I realized I am missing the "-u" flag later on. I mistakenly thought "-k" means kernel + user mode. What still puzzles me is that although I was sampling in kernel mode only, I still got samples in the user-code

Re: [perfmon2] Strangeness

2009-04-20 Thread stephane eranian
Nagy, On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Nagy Mostafa wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about something strange I have noticed while collecting > profiles using pfmon. When I run a single cold run of the 2to3 benchmark, > the "time" command (or using --show-time) gives me: > $time /usr/local/bin/p

Re: [perfmon2] Strangeness

2009-04-20 Thread J K Rai
wrote: From: Nagy Mostafa Subject: [perfmon2] Strangeness To: perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sunday, 19 April, 2009, 12:35 PM Hi, I have a question about something strange I have noticed while collecting profiles using pfmon. When I run a single cold run of the 2to3 benchmark, the

[perfmon2] Strangeness

2009-04-19 Thread Nagy Mostafa
Hi, I have a question about something strange I have noticed while collecting profiles using pfmon. When I run a single cold run of the 2to3 benchmark, the "time" command (or using --show-time) gives me: $time /usr/local/bin/python -E -O benchmarks/unladen-swallow/lib/2to3/2to3 -f all benchmarks/u