> Thanks
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Stephane Eranian [mailto:eran...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 09, 2014 1:37 AM
> *To:* Vince Weaver
> *Cc:* Gary Mohr; Michel Brown; perfmon2-devel
> *Subject:* Re: [perfmon2] Error reporting when using invali
Subject: Re: [perfmon2] Error reporting when using invalid combination of
umasks.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Vince Weaver
mailto:vincent.wea...@maine.edu>> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Gary Mohr wrote:
> --- ls output removed ---
>
> Performance counter sta
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Vince Weaver
wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Gary Mohr wrote:
>
> > --- ls output removed ---
> >
> > Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls':
> >
> > 5,625 uncore_cbox_0/event=0x35,umask=0xa/
> [26.27%]
> > uncore_cbox_0/event=0x35
Gary,
Sorry for late reply. Was on vacation for some time.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Gary Mohr wrote:
> Hi Stephane,
>
>
>
> We have run into an error condition which I do not think is handled
> properly. If I run the following command, I get this error:
>
>
>
>
>
> papi_command_line s
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Gary Mohr wrote:
> --- ls output removed ---
>
> Performance counter stats for '/bin/ls':
>
> 5,625 uncore_cbox_0/event=0x35,umask=0xa/
> [26.27%]
> uncore_cbox_0/event=0x35,umask=0x4a,filter_nid=0x1/
>
>0.0020389
better when they are in the same group,
then it may be worth doing.
So I guess I have more stuff to try.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Vince Weaver [mailto:vincent.wea...@maine.edu]
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 2:21 PM
> To: Gary Mohr
> Cc: Michel Brown; perfmon2-d
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Gary Mohr wrote:
> snbep_unc_cbo0::UNC_C_TOR_INSERTS:MISS_ALL:cpu=0
> snbep_unc_cbo0::UNC_C_TOR_INSERTS:NID_MISS_ALL:nf=0x1:cpu=0
> ...
> I will try using these events with perf. It is not my favorite tool but
> if it will either show that these events should work together
>
> > When I added a modified version of check_scheduability() to the uncore
> > component it now detects that the two events with constraint conflicts
> > cannot be used together. This allows PAPI to return an error at add
> > event time which is better than reporting it when trying to read the
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Gary Mohr wrote:
> When I added a modified version of check_scheduability() to the uncore
> component it now detects that the two events with constraint conflicts
> cannot be used together. This allows PAPI to return an error at add
> event time which is better than reporti
Hi Vince,
>
> I presume that the code you referred to above is the function
> check_scheduability() which is in the core component but not the uncore
> component. I will try putting this code into the uncore component to see if
> it handles this condition any better. It will need some adjustmen
See comments inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vince Weaver [mailto:vincent.wea...@maine.edu]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 8:58 PM
> To: Gary Mohr
> Cc: Stephane Eranian; Michel Brown; perfmon2-devel
> Subject: Re: [perfmon2] Error reporting when using inva
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Gary Mohr wrote:
> Given this sequence of events, I understand why neither PAPI or libpfm4
> detected that these events cannot be used at the same time. But it seems to
> me like the kernel should have been able to detect this when the second
> event was opened and return an
12 matches
Mail list logo
