On 09/05/2012 03:39 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
> Will,
>
>
> I have applied your patch.
> What is left to fix from the Coverity output?
Hi Stephane,
Thanks. Coverity doesn't seems to be smart enough to determine there are enough
',' in the string to eliminate the possibility of getting NULL
Will,
I have applied your patch.
What is left to fix from the Coverity output?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:16 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:25 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 09/03/2012 10:23 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
>>> Will,
>>>
>>> I have fixed most of the warnings r
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:25 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 10:23 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
>> Will,
>>
>> I have fixed most of the warnings reported by your tool.
>> Please pull and try again.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:17 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>>> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, s
On 09/04/2012 10:25 AM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 10:23 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
>> Will,
>>
>> I have fixed most of the warnings reported by your tool.
>> Please pull and try again.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:17 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>>> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, stephane e
On 09/03/2012 10:23 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
> Will,
>
> I have fixed most of the warnings reported by your tool.
> Please pull and try again.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:17 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, stephane eranian wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, W
Will,
I have fixed most of the warnings reported by your tool.
Please pull and try again.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:17 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, stephane eranian wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to do the ld
Problem solved.
Test was wrong. Was using >= instead of >.
It hit this event only because it had exactly 8 umasks!
Thanks for reporting and tracking down the problem.
Please pull again.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:32 PM, stephane eranian
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:02 PM, William Cohen wr
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:02 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 06:28 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>
>>> Hi Stephane,
>>>
>>> Thanks so much for the fresh libpfm-4.3.0 release. I just built a version
>>> for fedora rawhide at:
>>>
>>
On 08/29/2012 06:28 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>> Hi Stephane,
>>
>> Thanks so much for the fresh libpfm-4.3.0 release. I just built a version
>> for fedora rawhide at:
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=350950
>>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 06:29 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have finally released libpfm version 4.3.0.
>>
>> As expected, it includes many updates, improvements and bug fixes.
>> Many thanks to all the people who have contributed to th
On 08/28/2012 12:03 PM, stephane eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, William Cohen wrote:
>>
>> Would it be possible to do the ldconf separately from the "make install"?
>> The rpm packages are built as normal users with a staged install and the
>> ldconf is done as a post install
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, William Cohen wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 06:29 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have finally released libpfm version 4.3.0.
>>
>> As expected, it includes many updates, improvements and bug fixes.
>> Many thanks to all the people who have contributed to th
On 08/28/2012 06:29 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have finally released libpfm version 4.3.0.
>
> As expected, it includes many updates, improvements and bug fixes.
> Many thanks to all the people who have contributed to this release.
>
> Highlights:
>
> - ARM Cortex A15 support (T
13 matches
Mail list logo
