Re: [perfmon2] new 2.6.28 perfmon2, libpfm, and pfmon versions available

Vince, Try poulling both libpfm and pfmon and let me know if you still get compilation errors. On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:39 PM, stephane eranian wrote: > Vince, > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Vince Weaver wrote: >> Hello >> >> just two minor problems with the MIPS/r12k support.  Otherw

[perfmon2] Interpreting output with and without long sampling period

Hi , I ran perfmon with and without long sampling periods and got the following result. With long sampling periods pfmon reported 18,446,744,073,709,537,715 INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED Without sampling, 436,652 INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED I don't know what I have done incorrectly. Am I interpreting the numb

Re: [perfmon2] Interpreting output with and without long sampling period

Ananth, On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Ananth wrote: > Hi , > I ran perfmon with and without long sampling periods and got the > following result. > > With long sampling periods pfmon reported > 18,446,744,073,709,537,715 INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED > > Without sampling, >  436,652 INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRE

Re: [perfmon2] new 2.6.28 perfmon2, libpfm, and pfmon versions available

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, stephane eranian wrote: > Try poulling both libpfm and pfmon and let me know if you > still get compilation errors. One last error with pfmon: pfmon_util_mips64.c: In function pfmon_get_dlopen_hook: pfmon_util_mips64.c:537: error: passing argument 5 of find_sym_addr from in