Robert.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 10.02.10 17:01:45, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> I was referring to the fact that if I enable LBR via a PERF_SAMPLE_* bit, I
>> will actually need more than one bit because there are configuration options.
>> I was not talking abou
I'm experimenting performance counter to find deterministic events.
I originally thought that the number of retired instructions will be the
same for every run of the program with the same input. However, it was not.
The following is the result with the 'task' example provided in libpfm4
package.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:17 PM, heechul Yun wrote:
> I'm experimenting performance counter to find deterministic events.
>
> I originally thought that the number of retired instructions will be the
> same for every run of the program with the same input. However, it was not.
>
> The following is
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, heechul Yun wrote:
> I'm experimenting performance counter to find deterministic events.
>
> I originally thought that the number of retired instructions will be the
> same for every run of the program with the same input. However, it was not.
>
> ///
>
> What is the reason
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:37 AM, stephane eranian
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:17 PM, heechul Yun
> wrote:
> > I'm experimenting performance counter to find deterministic events.
> >
> > I originally thought that the number of retired instructions will be the
> > same for every run of the
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:57 PM, heechul Yun wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:37 AM, stephane eranian
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:17 PM, heechul Yun
>> wrote:
>> > I'm experimenting performance counter to find deterministic events.
>> >
>> > I originally thought that the numb
