On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:03 AM, heechul Yun wrote:
> Hello
> I've used "inst_stored:stores" event to get a deterministic number for a
> given program execution on my Core2Duo workstation.
> Recently, I got a brand new i7 machine with 8 cores, but I found that
> "inst_stored:stores" is not supporte
./task ls -e "BR_INST_RETIRED"
686804 BR_INST_RETIRED
686803 BR_INST_RETIRED
686805 BR_INST_RETIRED
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:03 PM, stephane eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:03 AM, heechul Yun wrote:
> > Hello
> > I've used "inst_stored:stores
I am very sorry for the prior message which is sent accidentally during
writing.
I used perf_examples/task.c and performed the following simple measurement
for 'ls' command several times.
./task ls -e "BR_INST_RETIRED"
686804 BR_INST_RETIRED <-- first execution
686
Kernel 2.6.29.5, vanilla, patched from perfmon-new-base-090622. I get the
following error:
CC arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon_pebs_core_smpl.o
CC arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon_amd64.o
CC arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon_intel_atom.o
CC arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon_intel_nhm.o
LD arch/x8
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:21 AM, heechul Yun wrote:
> I am very sorry for the prior message which is sent accidentally during
> writing.
> I used perf_examples/task.c and performed the following simple measurement
> for 'ls' command several times.
>
> ./task ls -e "BR_INST_RETIRED"
>
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> Kernel 2.6.29.5, vanilla, patched from perfmon-new-base-090622. I get the
> following error:
>
> CC arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon_pebs_core_smpl.o
> CC arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon_amd64.o
> CC arch/x86/perfmon/perfmon_intel_atom.o
>
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM, stephane eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:21 AM, heechul Yun
> wrote:
> > I am very sorry for the prior message which is sent accidentally during
> > writing.
> > I used perf_examples/task.c and performed the following simple
> measurement
> > for 'ls' co
> But it depends on what you want to do.
I want to be able to build a kernel that can run pfmon on a Xeon CPU. I
don't really mind exactly what version of kernel. Is there a kernel+patch
combination that will work?
Thanks.
-
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Keith Edmunds wrote:
>> But it depends on what you want to do.
>
> I want to be able to build a kernel that can run pfmon on a Xeon CPU. I
> don't really mind exactly what version of kernel. Is there a kernel+patch
> combination that will work?
>
I recommend using t
