Corey,
Glad to see this patch. This functionality had been on my wishlist for some
time. This is needed to validate the multi-group support. I have a few comments,
see below.
> diff --git a/perf_examples/perf_util.c b/perf_examples/perf_util.c
> index 4de21a8..3853ddf 100644
> --- a/perf_examples
On 4/30/2010 1:15 AM, stephane eranian wrote:
> Corey,
>
> Glad to see this patch. This functionality had been on my wishlist for some
> time. This is needed to validate the multi-group support. I have a few
> comments,
> see below.
>
>> diff --git a/perf_examples/perf_util.c b/perf_examples/p
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:28:02PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use perf trace to dump the raw samples.
>
> $ perf record -R noploop 5
> noploop for 5 seconds
> [ perf record: Woken up 3 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.269 MB perf.data (~1175
Hi Stephane,
When I posted the patch, I hadn't really tested it much. Now that I'm testing
it, I'm seeing some very strange behavior. After I worked through a number of
oversights I had made, I have come to this point where I find that grouping and
"enable_on_exec" don't appear to work togeth
