Hi,
I am trying to understand how perf record deals with buildids.
I am interested in offline and not live processing. According
to http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/1/5, the inject patch does not
change perf record. It should still save the buildids at the
end of the perf.data file. I suspect it does n
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Shirley, John David
wrote:
> I’m trying to get perfmon2 to work with Nehalem EX.
>
>
>
> # more /proc/cpuinfo
>
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>
> cpu family : 6
>
> model : 46
>
>
>
> It is clear that the latest releases do not support this proces
It is hard to read very large numbers so provide an option to perf stat
to separate thousands using a separator. The patch leverages the locale
support of stdio. You need to set your LC_NUMERIC appropriately, for
instance LC_NUMERIC=en_US.UTF8. You need to pass -B to activate this
feature. This way
Is this patch applied to mainline kernel git repository?
I checked out Linus's one but it seemed not.
Or I would like to know how to enable user level read so that I do not need
syscall to get the counter value which took about 400ns overhead per call on
my machine.
Thanks.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM, heechul Yun wrote:
> Is this patch applied to mainline kernel git repository?
> I checked out Linus's one but it seemed not.
> Or I would like to know how to enable user level read so that I do not need
> syscall to get the counter value which took about 400ns over
Hi,
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to understand how perf record deals with buildids.
> I am interested in offline and not live processing. According
> to http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/1/5, the inject patch does not
> change perf record. It should sti
Hi,
I'm getting the following warnings:
In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:1343:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c: In function
‘amd_put_event_constraints’:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c:167: warning: value computed is not
used
Since cmpxchg returns a value, we need
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:36 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to understand how perf record deals with buildids.
> I am interested in offline and not live processing. According
> to http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/1/5, the inject patch does not
> change perf record. It should s
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 16:43 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting the following warnings:
>
> In file included from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:1343:
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c: In function
> ‘amd_put_event_constraints’:
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c:167: warni