Hi,
Yes, please use perf_events and the perf tool instead.
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:26 AM, 陳韋任 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current Linux kernel has native support for performance
> monitoring. Just update your linux kernel, and use `perf`
> instead.
>
> See https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/
>
> Regar
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:27 AM, 陳韋任 wrote:
> Hi, stephane
>
> I have one Linux/SPARC T2 machine at hand. I am trying examples in
> the libpfm4/examples and libpfm4/perf_examples.
>
> I have a question about "perf_examples/evt2raw". What input should I
> give it? The help message give me n
Hi,
> evt2raw is a simple tool to convert from an event string to a code that can be
> passed directly to perf:
>
> $ perf stat -e `evt2raw inst_retired:any_p` /bin/ls
I am a little confuse here. First, are there examples show what event strings
can be
given to `evt2raw`? I tried your exa
陳韋任你好，
On 03/14/2011 02:20 AM, 陳韋任 wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> evt2raw is a simple tool to convert from an event string to a code that can
>> be
>> passed directly to perf:
>>
>> $ perf stat -e `evt2raw inst_retired:any_p` /bin/ls
>
>I am a little confuse here. First, are there examples show what
Hi, Corey
Thanks. It is really help. :)
> are not in the list given by "perf list", you must use a raw event code,
> by specifying an 'r' followed by the event's hex code.
I note there is a line at the bottom of `perf list` says,
rNNN (see 'perf list --help' on how to encode it) [Raw hardw
Hi, Stephane
I have one suggestion. Since perfmon2 is pretty well-known or googleable.
Maybe you can put a FAQ or something else on the website to explain the
differences between pfmon and perf, libpfmX and libpfm4, and recommend
them to use perf and libpfm4. Is this a good idea?
Regards,
chenw
