On 11/04/2013 12:20 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> Hello
>
> here's an updated version of the arm64 patch.
>
> This version does not have any separate "arm64" naming, it just uses
> ARM_ARMv8. In theory you can boot a 32-bit kernel on an armv8 machine
> so the 64-bit distinction isn't needed anyway.
A Coverity scan pointed out that the argument for the sizeof() for a
perf_read_buffer() call was suspect. The perf_read_buffer() third
argument is the size of the buffer pointed to in the second argument.
Other places in the code are doing that and this call should also.
Signed-off-by: William Co
