Hi,
I was reviewing some test results issues with Michael Petlan. Some of the
testing at Red Hat is done on guest VMs. PAPI and libpfm use the CPU model
number to determine which performance events are available. This works
reasonably well for many of the events. However, there are a couple
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, William Cohen wrote:
> Any thoughts on how to better determine which events are actually
> available on the machine and limit the libpfm/PAPI event lists to usable
> events?
does the perf tool handle this better than PAPI does? If so we could try
to do whatever it does.
