http://www.kdnuggets.com/news/2003/n19/13i.html
The Information Technology and Systems Center (ITSC) at the University
of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) announces the public release of the
Algorithm Development and Mining (ADaM) version 4.0 toolkit. ITSC
conducts multidisciplinary research in many fa
It would be cool to have papers on Perl and AI here. A very cool
thing would be for someone to organize a technical session (six paper)
on Perl and AI.
Nat
--- start of forwarded message ---
> C A L L F O R P A P E R S
>
>The 2003 International Multiconference in
http://www.kdnuggets.com/news/2002/n12/14i.html
> Version 0.5 of the Bigram Statistics Package is now available, and
> has been renamed the N-gram Statistics Package (NSP v0.5).
>
> NSP is an easy-to-use suite of Perl tools for counting and analyzing
> word n-grams in text. It provides a number o
http://norvig.com/python/python.html
http://ai.fri.uni-lj.si/~aleks/orng/
Perl, Python, whatever :-)
Nat
Simon Cozens writes:
> I can put you in touch with a couple of bioinformatics/Perl people, but
> I don't know how much or if that would help.
Thanks, but I already know a few. I was more interested in whether
there were AI people doing work in the field. If the one response
I've received is any
> > ...speaking of which, is anyone familiar with Thomas M. Mitchell's book
> > "Machine Learning"? It has only positive reviews on Amazon, but I'm not
> > sure whether that's reliable.
I have the book, and really really like it. I found it comprehensible
and useful.
Nat
John Porter writes:
> > I'm not picking on John, but I think this list would be a whole lot
> > more productive and interesting if the conversation was focussed on
> > things that *we* are trying to do, not random people.
>
> I hear what you're saying, Nat.
> But I'm not sure I understand it.
John Porter writes:
> Lots of problems people try to attack in the real world take hours
> or days to solve, on heavy iron.
I'm not picking on John, but I think this list would be a whole lot
more productive and interesting if the conversation was focussed on
things that *we* are trying to do, no