https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
"FeRD" (Frank Dana) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ferd...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2180842
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Let's discuss behaviour of dnf5 in the dnf5 bug…
In the context of this package, what Petr wrote.
Let's say that 'rt' had a dependency on 'foo' (Requires:foo), and it turns out
that
'foo'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ---
So the perfectly valid (though discouraged) behavior results failed
dependencies unless a non-default configuration option is set. That's 100% a
bug; there's simply no other way to state it.
If this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ---
It's mainly driven by a configuration option. See bug #2173051 comment #2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ---
Isn't the extra info is only downloaded if you're installing or querying this
very niche leaf package? Or does the mere existence of a file dependency
anywhere in the distribution cause DNF to download
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> Still an issue with rt-5.0.3-4.fc38.src.rpm.
This has never been an issue. This BZ is just silly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700
--- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 31 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 31 on 2020-11-24.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from
14 matches
Mail list logo