[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||mod_perl-2.0.12-3.el9

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7128d5a274 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Status|CLOSED

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7128d5a274 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7128d5a274 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- My approach for building mod_perl was keep the tests in %check phase of a spec file enabled, and simply resubmit failed builds in Koji until they pass. 0--4 resubmits usually are enough. The spec file also

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Bauer --- Yes, yes I did. I may regret it. I spent the day yesterday reading mod_perl bug reports, which grew to searching bug reports from other popular distros. Poaching patches and other relevant info from other

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar --- Now I can see you wrote "the entire project". I gave you this package in Fedora and in EPEL. I whish you good luck with this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --- (In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #4) > I'll take the entire project. My FAS account is kni. > Great to hear there is somebody willing to maintain mod_perl. Do you want only EPEL, or also Fedora? > It

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Bauer --- I'll take the entire project. My FAS account is kni. It looks like the failed test occurs only on EPEL 9 x86_64 architecture: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kni/mod_perl-for-epel/build/3291634/

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zonexpertconsulting@outlook

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2031812 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2031751 Referenced Bugs: