yselkowitz commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build
with/without big frameworks` that you are following:
``
Also, note that there are other unwanted Perl dependencies that are currently
being pulled in by perl-Type-Tiny, so this won't necessarily be sufficient.
``
To reply,
yselkowitz commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build
with/without big frameworks` that you are following:
``
But if we minimize things here rather than in FCGI, perhaps it would be cleaner
to have a single bcond to cover all the big deps?
``
To reply, visit the link below
yselkowitz commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build
with/without big frameworks` that you are following:
``
It's either this, or the FCGI client tests get skipped entirely (per the other
PR), because these BuildRequires are unwanted in RHEL/ELN.
``
To reply, visit the link
corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build with/without
big frameworks` that you are following:
``
I am hesitant, because I fail to understand the rationale behind it and am
close to consider it "featuritis".
``
To reply, visit the link below
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Add conditions for build with/without
big frameworks` that you are following:
``
@corsepiu Is it ok for you or not? :-)
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Type-Tiny/pull-request/1
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Type-Tiny` that
you are following:
``
Add conditions for build with/without big frameworks
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Type-Tiny/pull-request/1
