On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Note that the perl-sig
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively
maintained. It's at least how I remember the
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have
packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig
wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
The list of orphaned packages is
