https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501159
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501382
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500267
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500246
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500217
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500209
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-007978fe30 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033633
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a3d0a9fa80 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050787
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
--- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
During a chat with Xavier on IRC, I realized we were waiting on Ralf to approve
Xavier's PR to the package (because Xavier prefers to avoid diverging git
history between 2 branches). I don't see this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050896
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Cameron ---
I just now verified the bug by these steps:
1) created a clean minimal fedora 35 virtual machine
2) dnf install perl-bignum-0.53-2.fc35.noarch
3) dnf update
The result was what I previously reported.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050896
Bug ID: 2050896
Summary: Broken Dependencies on perl(Math::Bigint) and
perl(Mat::BigRat)
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component: perl-bignum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|xav...@bachelot.org |emman...@seyman.fr
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050787
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050787
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|perl-Best |perl-bignum
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050787
Bug ID: 2050787
Summary: Upgrade to perl-bignum-0..0-1.fc35 fails
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Best
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050787
Eric Ashley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade to |Upgrade to
xavierb commented on the pull-request: `Drop support for mod_perl in EL9 and
later` that you are following:
``
Hi Ralf,
This is the last item before being able to build perl-Plack in EPEL 9.
I'd like to have this is in the rawhide branch rather than just the epel9
branch to avoid a diverting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth ---
Branch creation is done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601
--- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar ---
My approach for building mod_perl was keep the tests in %check phase of a spec
file enabled, and simply resubmit failed builds in Koji until they pass. 0--4
resubmits usually are enough. The spec file also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Bauer ---
Yes, yes I did. I may regret it.
I spent the day yesterday reading mod_perl bug reports, which grew to searching
bug reports from other popular distros. Poaching patches and other relevant
info from other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ---
Now I can see you wrote "the entire project". I gave you this package in Fedora
and in EPEL. I whish you good luck with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
--- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth ---
Branch creation request:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41779
Robert, will you do a combined build+update of this and perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042867
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
28 matches
Mail list logo
