[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Bug 1738385 depends on bug 1744678, which changed state. Bug 1744678 Summary: [RFE] Can perl-Linux-Pid be branched for EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744678 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Bug 1738385 depends on bug 1744676, which changed state. Bug 1744676 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-BSD-Resource https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744676 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mod_perl-2.0.10-17.el8 |mod_perl-2.0.10-17.el8

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8a40115999 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-8a40115999 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #14 from yoshida.ryui...@bsearchtech.com --- > (1) The mod_perl tests fail randomly. Just a thought. (although you may be already aware and have tested this...) httpd versions and default MPM settings are: RHEL6 - httpd 2.2 -

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar --- perl-Apache-Reload is also needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1744678, 1744676 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|epel7

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-09-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1744714 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #10 from Pat Riehecky --- I'll confess interest in mod_perl in order to support OCS Inventory Server. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #9 from yoshida.ryui...@bsearchtech.com --- The reason we used mod_perl was, simply because we did not want our 10K+ lines of perl codes (stateless API) compiled at each request. Now my prototype (full coverage) is running on

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- CGI::Fast is for running CGI scripts through FastCGI protocol. There is no need for that. Instead you should execute the CGI scripts as a normal CGI script directly by the httpd. You only need to configure

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #7 from yoshida.ryui...@bsearchtech.com --- Thanks for the suggestions. I'll continue to look into each of the suggested alternatives(including Plack/PSGI). Now for FastCGI/RHEL8.1 beta, I cannot find CGI::Fast module in RHEL8.1

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5) > Plack as it is packaged in Fedora requires (at least for building) mod_perl. Yes, there's a Plack::Handler::Apache2 to run PSGI apps using mod_perl2 and it

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --- Plack as it is packaged in Fedora requires (at least for building) mod_perl. I have locally tried to drop the dependency and I was successful. I was even successful with packaging the Plack stack into

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emman...@seyman.fr --- Comment #4

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- If you don't need long-running server jobs or preserving a state between HTTP requests, I would go with classical CGI scripts. If you want to have a server spanning across multiple HTTP requests, mod_fcgid

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #2 from yoshida.ryui...@bsearchtech.com --- Thank you for status updates on mod_perl. Now I think I should look for some viable alternatives. Do you have any advice on using mod_fcgid as an alternative, mainly from

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

2019-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- I could add mod_perl into EPEL, but there are two issues you should be aware about: (1) The mod_perl tests fail randomly. I believe this is some race condition corrupting internal mod_perl/perl/httpd state.