https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |EOL
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Gitlab
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Juan Orti Alcaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|amavisd-new |amavis
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jorti...@redhat.com |j.orti.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|j.orti.alca...@gmail.com|jorti..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #17 from Juan Orti ---
I'd need to package the unar-wrapper, which I don't see the code around. I also
think it will be better to be included in the unar package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #16 from Robert Scheck ---
https://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-users/2016-December/004694.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
amavisd-new-2.9.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
amavisd-new-2.9.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
amavisd-new-2.9.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-0f72359c5d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #8)
> Probably. "robert" is a maintainer in EPEL.
Yes, that's me...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
amavisd-new-2.11.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-5f6d89febd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #6 from Juan Orti ---
I still can download lrzip from the epel7 repositories, shouldn't it be
removed?
I'm going to submit the removal of lrzip. I've also made the dependencies weak
in rawhide.
I'm holding the unar update because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #5 from Juan Orti ---
unar is not working as-is, it uses different arguments. I'm looking into it.
dic 12 09:36:40 helio amavis[3002]: (03002-01) (!)Decoding of p003 (RAR archive
data, v4, os: Win32) failed, leaving it unpacked: d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck ---
(In reply to Juan Orti from comment #2)
> Why to comment lrz? doesn't if fail gracefully when the decoder is not
> present?
Yes and no. It gracefully fails, but it still leaves a message mentioning
a lack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(j.orti.alcaine@gm |
|ail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(j.orti.alcaine@gm
22 matches
Mail list logo
