On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:00:46PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
Some dual-life modules, like PathTools and CGI, are placed within
vendor path in Fedora 15.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:45:40AM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:00:46PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
Some dual-life modules,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:00:46PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
Some dual-life modules, like PathTools and CGI, are placed within
vendor path in Fedora 15. This situation is not expected by some
applications, for example, cpanm
Hi, all!
Some dual-life modules, like PathTools and CGI, are placed within
vendor path in Fedora 15. This situation is not expected by some
applications, for example, cpanm -L command will definitely fail if
an installing package needs such dual-life modules.
So, why not just exclude such
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:00:46PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote:
Some dual-life modules, like PathTools and CGI, are placed within
vendor path in Fedora 15. This situation is not expected by some
applications, for example, cpanm -L command will definitely fail if
an installing package needs such