On 5 December 2010 07:54, Naveed Massjouni wrote:
> This thread is really depressing. Personally, I like all of Shlomi's
> suggestions. I can't fathom why bareword global filehandles are still
> pervasive in the perl docs. But instead of the community getting to
> discuss the merits of the chan
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:34:35PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> Now I think that some of my style/best-practices suggestions are an
> improvement and I'd like to pursue them.
And I'm strongly against that sentiment.
I really do think p5p, and hence the documentation, should *not* have a
style
> The way I see it what happened was that I wrote an email with aspects of
> perlipc.pod that I found lacking, and not idiomatic up to recent best
> practices, thcrist replying that he doesn't like any of the changes and
> VETOing them (without saying why the status quo was better, just by givin
On 6 December 2010 19:25, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> This witch-hunt is counter-productive and harmful. You should not
> be offended, or even surprised, if its results are not agreed to.
Tom, using terms like "witch-hunt" is not fair - it implies there is
malice intent on Shlomi's behalf which I
On 6 December 2010 19:01, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi Yves,
>
> On Monday 06 December 2010 10:42:23 demerphq wrote:
>> On 5 December 2010 07:54, Naveed Massjouni wrote:
>> > This thread is really depressing. Personally, I like all of Shlomi's
>> > suggestions. I can't fathom why bareword global fil
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:45:01PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Monday 06 December 2010 19:49:44 Abigail wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:34:35PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > Now I think that some of my style/best-practices suggestions are an
> > > improvement and I'd like to pursue them.
