On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 00:00, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> Having a little debate over this on a Perl::Critic ticket. I'm not
> sure anyone is sure and the docs don't say.
>
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=69234
>
>
> is it package foo { ... 1; } or package foo { ... }; 1; ? or what?
> and
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 08:53, Chas. Owens wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 00:00, Caleb Cushing wrote:
>> Having a little debate over this on a Perl::Critic ticket. I'm not
>> sure anyone is sure and the docs don't say.
>>
>> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=69234
snip
I have just rerea
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article , Caleb
Cushing wrote:
> Having a little debate over this on a Perl::Critic ticket. I'm not
> sure anyone is sure and the docs don't say.
>
> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Flavio Poletti wrote:
> i.e. it advices you to return a true value from the *file*, not from the
> package. This seems to be confirmed by require's documentation:
>
> The file must return true as the last statement to indicate
> success
