Re: range-upper/range-lower

2003-11-26 Thread Chris Ridd
On 26/11/03 12:15 pm, Hirmke Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > [...] >> Everything looks OK, except for the missing stuff. Are you certain the >> server's actually returning the missing stuff? > > uhm, sorry, perhaps I asked the wrong question 8-( > I'm quite sure, that the actual ans

RE: range-upper/range-lower

2003-11-26 Thread Hirmke Michael
Hi, [...] > Everything looks OK, except for the missing stuff. Are you certain the > server's actually returning the missing stuff? uhm, sorry, perhaps I asked the wrong question 8-( I'm quite sure, that the actual answer does *not* include the missing stuff. The better question might be: In whic