On Jan 11, 2006, at 6:35 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:20 PM + Peter Walsham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris, thanks for your reply.
To put this another way, with Net::LDAP how do you do a simple
bind with a DN and an empty password?
Amazing to see t
Just for the archive..
- Original message ---
Onderwerp: Re: Net::LDAP::FilterMatch
Van: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Ma, 19 december, 2005 9:26
Aan: "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Hi Andy,
On Thursday, 12. January 2006 02:15, Webb, Andy wrote:
> 1. canonical_dn takes an option parameter casefold, but it doesn't
> pass casefold to ldap_explode_dn, which it uses internally, so
> casefold=none is impossible. Casefold=upper works, because the case is
> assertively changed
Hi Hans,
On Sunday, 18. December 2005 21:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> attached is Net::LDAP::FilterMatch, a module to match Net::LDAP::Entry
> objects against a Net::LDAP::Filter filter.
> It can be used to filter out entries from an LDIF, but also as a simple
> solution for searching while usin
Hi,
On Wednesday, 11. January 2006 10:10, Gergely Sánta wrote:
> Chris Ridd wrote:
> >On 11/1/06 8:21, Gergely Sánta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>--Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >>>--On Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:29 PM +0100 Gergely Sánta
> >>>
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
Hi,
On Tuesday, 10. January 2006 20:49, Jim Schnitter wrote:
> I'm having some problems getting the PersistentSearch Control working.
> I've taken the example and found that it's not setting the OID
> correctly. Here's the relevant code snippet:
>
I cannot reproduce the problem.
What version of
Peter,
I ran my tests and it still does what it should ;-)
Formally the LE & GE should use string comparison for CIS, but until
schema support has been build in (maybe as optional), the numeric
comparison trick will be ok.
I'm thinking about using Net::LDAP::Schema to determine the attribute
Thanks for all your replies.
Conclusions So Far
===
So can I now conclude that the three following statements are correct?
1) ldapsearch does not properly implement LDAP
2) Active Directory does not properly implement LDAP
3) I cannot use Net::LDAP to authenticate users wi
--On Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:24 PM + Peter Walsham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for all your replies.
Conclusions So Far
===
So can I now conclude that the three following statements are correct?
1) ldapsearch does not properly implement LDAP
2) Active
On 12/1/06 2:24, Peter Walsham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) I cannot use Net::LDAP to authenticate users with empty passwords
As Graham and I both noted, you *can* do a bind with a DN and an empty
password if you pass noauth => 1 in the bind call. You have to do that
instead of passing passwor
Oh the joys of working with AD! :(
Looking at these messages leads me to believe that
Peter has the same situation that I have working with
our AD. His ldapsearch examples and problems with the
null password lead me to believe this.
Here is my AD situation.
With our AD, you can not CONNEC
On 12/1/06 8:13, Harden, Clif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Oh the joys of working with AD! :(
>
> Looking at these messages leads me to believe that
> Peter has the same situation that I have working with
> our AD. His ldapsearch examples and problems with the
> null password lead me to
I just put the windows version of ethereal on my pc system.
If I get time I'll try to sniff some packets to see what is
going on.
Regards,
Clif Harden
-Original Message-
From: Chris Ridd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:25 PM
To: Harden, Clif; Peter
As far as I can see, a bind where you set 'noauth'=>1 doesn't tell you
whether a user exists with a correct password (testing with Active
Directory).
The following always returns "Success" regardless of the DN, but the bind
can't be used for searching.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warni
Fantastic, found and tested catch all that works with AD and Net::LDAP
without any nasty hacking. Thanks for your help Graham, Chris et al...
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Net::LDAP;
my $dn = 'cn=Joe,ou=London,o=axomic';
my $password = '';
my $ldapServer = new Net::LDA
On 12/1/06 7:51, Peter Walsham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> As far as I can see, a bind where you set 'noauth'=>1 doesn't tell you
> whether a user exists with a correct password (testing with Active
> Directory).
>
> The following always returns "Success" regardless of the DN, but the bind
16 matches
Mail list logo
