I am trying to use a slightly modified version of the Net::LDAP example
scripts with paging and callbacks against Oracle Internet directory.
I am using perl 5.14.2 and very fresh versions of all the CPAN modules.
The script fails with:
LDAP Search Failed: decode error 22 75 at
/run/pd/csm/64-b
On 19 Jan 2012, at 01:35, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
> I am trying to use a slightly modified version of the Net::LDAP example
> scripts with paging and callbacks against Oracle Internet directory.
>
> I am using perl 5.14.2 and very fresh versions of all the CPAN modules.
>
> The script fai
On Jan 19, 2012, at 7:12 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
> On 19 Jan 2012, at 01:35, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>
>> I am trying to use a slightly modified version of the Net::LDAP example
>> scripts with paging and callbacks against Oracle Internet directory.
>>
>> I am using perl 5.14.2 and very
On 19 Jan 2012, at 12:39, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
> Two bugs! Such a deal!
No extra charge :-)
> Yes, the cookie setting code is in the while (1) loop and the callback merely
> prints out the dn of the returned entries.
You mentioned that the OpenLDAP ldapsearch command-line tool seemed
On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:21, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
> On 19 Jan 2012, at 12:39, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>
>> Two bugs! Such a deal!
>
> No extra charge :-)
>
>> Yes, the cookie setting code is in the while (1) loop and the callback
>> merely prints out the dn of the returned entries.
>
> Y
On 19 Jan 2012, at 14:00, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:21, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19 Jan 2012, at 12:39, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>>
>>> Two bugs! Such a deal!
>>
>> No extra charge :-)
>>
>>> Yes, the cookie setting code is in the while (1) loop and
On 19 Jan 2012, at 14:05, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
> On 19 Jan 2012, at 14:00, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:21, Chris Ridd wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 19 Jan 2012, at 12:39, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>>>
Two bugs! Such a deal!
>>>
>>> No extra charge :-)
>>>
On Jan 19, 2012, at 15:16, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
> On 19 Jan 2012, at 14:05, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19 Jan 2012, at 14:00, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:21, Chris Ridd wrote:
>>>
On 19 Jan 2012, at 12:39, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
>>