Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>
> > pretty straightforward and the wrapper is pretty thin. Anybody writing
> > *straightforward* XS would do it pretty much the same way as Inline.
>
> Not necessarily. Inline uses a peculiar style which exposes both entry
> points. For example, it generates code lik
Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> >
> > I just read C code produced by Inline and found that - correct me if
> > I'm wrong - it just builds a wrapper around a C function.
>
> Oh! Indeed it does. Hm hm.
I've been avoiding commenting on this thread, because these are Event
issues, and as long as Inline
