<> Well, there were some recent modifications to this portion of the code to
<> solve some bugs, so it's possible that those bugs were covering over this
<> problem, if people were using writeable _non-blocking_ sockets.
I /am/ using a non-blocking socket, btw.
I figured, that there must have be
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:06:53PM -0400, Allen Smith wrote:
> > Since the Event::io module is very flexible in regards to what events can
> > be "waited" for: Why not introduce another set of conditions, like
> > "urgent" ('u') or "out-of-band" ('o') to still provide the functionality
> > for tho
On May 25, 6:37pm, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2002, Allen Smith wrote:
>
> > Perhaps because POLLOUT alone doesn't pick up "high-priority data
> > writeable" (at least it doesn't on IRIX)? Admittedly, high-priority data
> is, <> well, uncommon. Exactly what is the problem on Solar
On Sat, 25 May 2002, Allen Smith wrote:
<> On May 25, 6:28am, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
<> > <> > In the "HAS_POLL" version of pe_sys_multiplex() I replaced
<> > <> >
<> > <> > if (ev->poll & PE_W) bits |= (POLLOUT | POLLWRBAND);
<> > <> > with
<> > <> > if (ev->poll & PE_W) bits |= PO
On May 25, 6:28am, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> <> > In the "HAS_POLL" version of pe_sys_multiplex() I replaced
> <> >
> <> > if (ev->poll & PE_W) bits |= (POLLOUT | POLLWRBAND);
> <> > with
> <> > if (ev->poll & PE_W) bits |= POLLOUT;
> <> >
> <> > And everything works just the way expected. Now
<> > In the "HAS_POLL" version of pe_sys_multiplex() I replaced
<> >
<> >if (ev->poll & PE_W) bits |= (POLLOUT | POLLWRBAND);
<> > with
<> >if (ev->poll & PE_W) bits |= POLLOUT;
<> >
<> > And everything works just the way expected. Now I guess you didn't put in
<> > POLLWRBAND just for the
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:02:36AM +0200, Clemens Schrimpe wrote:
> Having had a fresh start this morning I played a bit with your code and
> figured it:
>
> In the "HAS_POLL" version of pe_sys_multiplex() I replaced
>
> if (ev->poll & PE_W) bits |= (POLLOUT | POLLWRBAND);
> with
> i
