Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> >
> > I just read C code produced by Inline and found that - correct me if
> > I'm wrong - it just builds a wrapper around a C function.
>
> Oh! Indeed it does. Hm hm.
I've been avoiding commenting on this thread, because these are Event
issues, and as long as Inline
Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>OK. Does anyone oppose changing the C callback from:
>
>(* (void(*)(void*,pe_event*)) ev->callback)(ev->ext_data, ev);
>
>To:
>
>(* (void(*)(pe_event*,void*)) ev->callback)(ev, ev->ext_data);
>
>?
I prefer the latter - it makes it more method-call
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 10:38:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >For what it's worth, we could make the APIs *appear* the same.
>
> That's what I meant - just simplifying the interface by making it more
> general.
>
> >However,
> >the programmer still needs to decide how the callback will b
