on-topic-content:
The first larger program using coroutines is now doing "mission
critical" work (failure == loss of relatively unimportant data). It's
my news-scanner which scans ~60 servers at the same time. It's just as
fast (600k/s is where the network tops out), requires only slightly more
m
> "PCG" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PCG> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:46:36AM -0700, Joshua Pritikin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PCG> Boy, I just learned more about perl internals than I ever imaged. The
PCG> only thing remaining is the regex machine and the exact details of this
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:46:36AM -0700, Joshua Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >I hope you found this posting somewhat entertaining...
>
> Wow! Outstanding!
Boy, I just learned more about perl internals than I ever imaged. The
only thing remaining is the regex machine and the exact det
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:46:36AM -0700, Joshua Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >I hope you found this posting somewhat entertaining...
>
> Wow! Outstanding!
it does not work (as i just found out), however, as perl doesn't like the
same sub to be entered from two different coroutines at
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> wrote:
>it is difficult to get the point across using a small program - the idea
>is to linearize programs, while still using the benefits of a state
>machine.
>
> ...snip...
>
> but given that I thought this to be much too complicated for many
