FAIL Event-0.83 IP27-irix 6.4

2002-01-21 Thread Ed Allen Smith
This distribution has been tested as part of the cpan-testers effort to test as many new uploads to CPAN as possible. See http://testers.cpan.org/ Please cc any replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to keep other test volunteers informed and to prevent any duplicate effort. -- README.IRIX's patch appea

Re: FAIL Event-0.83 IP27-irix 6.4

2002-01-21 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:42:30PM -0500, Ed Allen Smith wrote: > README.IRIX's patch appears to be needed on IRIX 6.4 as well as IRIX 6.5. I'm > afraid that Trey's SGI code only works on early IRIX versions... Now that i'm finally back on the mailing list, i can upload 0.84 tomorrow. Are there

Re: FAIL Event-0.83 IP27-irix 6.4

2002-01-21 Thread Allen Smith
On Jan 22, 1:24am, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:42:30PM -0500, Ed Allen Smith wrote: > > README.IRIX's patch appears to be needed on IRIX 6.4 as well as > > IRIX 6.5. I'm afraid that Trey's SGI code only works on early IRIX > > versions... > > Now that i'm finally back o

Re: StarvePrio

2002-01-21 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:33:25AM -0500, Allen Smith wrote: > > Are there any other important bugs that need to be addressed? > > Don't know myself of anything that qualifies as a _bug_... working on > the documentation (as in updating the manpage to have the information > on group watchers that

Re: StarvePrio

2002-01-21 Thread Allen Smith
On Jan 22, 1:51am, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:33:25AM -0500, Allen Smith wrote: > > > Are there any other important bugs that need to be addressed? > > > > Don't know myself of anything that qualifies as a _bug_... working on > > the documentation (as in updating th

Re: StarvePrio

2002-01-21 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:54:50AM -0500, Allen Smith wrote: > On Jan 22, 1:51am, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > Uh, OK. How's this patch? > > Well, once I managed to decipher the attachment (unknown-8bit is not a > helpful character set...), Hrm .. mutt's fault? > OK, except that I thought th